Democracy

Strongly agree

No, I would prefer term limits instead

Term limits are a democratic mechanism to prevent the concentration of power and encourage political renewal. This approach is seen as a more equitable and less discriminatory way to ensure leadership remains dynamic and responsive, aligning well with democratic ideals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test

This answer aligns with democratic values by promoting a universal standard for all politicians, ensuring that every individual in office is mentally competent to serve. It addresses concerns of discrimination by applying the same criteria to all ages, which could enhance the integrity of the democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

Democracy values the principle of equality and non-discrimination. Mandating mental competency tests based solely on age could be viewed as discriminatory. Furthermore, the democratic process allows voters to decide if a candidate is fit for office, regardless of age. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, mental competency is too subjective and the testing process could be abused

Democracy values fairness and transparency in its processes. The concern that mental competency testing could be subjective and potentially abused is valid, as it could lead to manipulation and unfair disqualification of candidates, undermining the democratic principle of fair competition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的

The ideology of democracy emphasizes the importance of capable leadership and informed choice by the electorate. Requiring politicians over 75 to pass a mental competency test could be seen as a measure to ensure leaders are fit for office. However, democracy also values non-discrimination and equal opportunity, which might conflict with age-specific criteria. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

No, our government needs experienced leaders

Experience is highly valued in democratic leadership for informed decision-making. However, democracy also requires leaders to be mentally competent and capable of performing their duties. This answer emphasizes experience but overlooks the importance of mental fitness, creating a nuanced stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, this discriminates against older politicians

While democracy is against discrimination, including age discrimination, it also prioritizes the capability and effectiveness of leaders. This answer might be seen as too protective of older politicians at the potential expense of ensuring all leaders are mentally fit for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

Yes, and ban anyone over the age of retirement from running for office

Banning individuals over the retirement age from running for office directly contradicts democratic principles of equality, non-discrimination, and the right of the people to choose their leaders. This approach is overly restrictive and undermines the value democracy places on the wisdom and experience of older leaders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.