Anti-Austerity

Very strongly agree

不

Anti-austerity advocates typically support equal access to services as a matter of public welfare and would likely view the proposal as creating unnecessary barriers to information, thus strongly supporting the idea of not allowing ISPs to manipulate access speeds based on payment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不，平等对待所有的通信量，并继续保持互联网的开放性

Advocating for equal treatment of all internet traffic aligns with anti-austerity principles that emphasize fairness, equality, and the protection of public resources from being unduly exploited for profit. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不应该，这会使他们消除竞争，导致人为的稀缺性，而且会提高价格

This answer aligns with anti-austerity principles by highlighting concerns over competition, artificial scarcity, and price increases, which are seen as negative consequences of prioritizing corporate profits over public access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，但是用种类决定优先权的派发（视频高于图像），而不是用来源（大网站高于小网站）

While this answer attempts to find a middle ground by suggesting prioritization by type rather than source, it still allows for potential manipulation and inequality in access, which would be of concern to anti-austerity advocates, though it's slightly less objectionable than outright prioritization by payment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的，只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

This answer still supports a model where payment influences quality of access, which would likely be opposed by anti-austerity advocates due to its potential to create inequality in internet access, even if it's framed as a pay-per-quality model. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

Anti-austerity ideology generally opposes policies that create economic inequality or prioritize profit over public welfare. Allowing ISPs to speed up access for higher-paying websites would likely be seen as exacerbating digital inequality, making this stance strongly opposed by anti-austerity advocates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的，对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

This answer justifies prioritizing profit over equitable access, which is contrary to anti-austerity principles that prioritize public welfare and equal access to resources, including the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.