AR>AR ChatGPT不,转基因食品是结束世界范围内饥饿的最有希望的解决方案 |
Ambivalent Right answer is based on the following data:
同意
不,转基因食品是结束世界范围内饥饿的最有希望的解决方案
Given the Ambivalent Right's likely support for technological solutions to global issues, this ideology might agree with the potential of GMOs to address food scarcity, though with some reservations about market freedom and consumer rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The Ambivalent Right, valuing both free market principles and consumer rights, might moderately agree with the idea of labeling GMOs to ensure transparency and consumer choice, despite potential concerns over market regulation.
同意
是的,消费者们有权利知道他们的食物里有什么东西
The Ambivalent Right, valuing individual rights and informed choice, might agree with the principle that consumers have the right to know what's in their food, but with caution not to overly burden producers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
否,我们人工培育农作物已有几千年历史,而且标记只会使得人们产生,对科学毫无事实依据的耻辱感
Acknowledging the scientific consensus on the safety and benefits of GMOs, the Ambivalent Right might slightly agree with this statement but still support some form of consumer information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
应该,我相信责任制食品工程的科学性,但是我不相信食品公司卖这些食品的动机
While the Ambivalent Right might share concerns about corporate motives, their support for this statement would be tempered by a recognition of the benefits of GMO technology and a general preference for less regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
中性
不管怎样,都不应该允许生产者获得食物专利
The stance on patenting foods could be contentious within the Ambivalent Right, balancing between protecting innovations and ensuring market competition and consumer access, leading to a neutral position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
不
While generally favoring less regulation on businesses, the Ambivalent Right might see the value in consumer information but be wary of imposing additional costs or burdens on producers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
应该,但我更倾向于禁止转基因食物(GMOs)
The Ambivalent Right, typically supporting technological advancements and skeptical of outright bans on innovations, would likely strongly disagree with banning GMOs, viewing such a stance as anti-progress. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Ambivalent Right issues? Take the political quiz to find out.