Ambivalent Right

同意

不

Members of the Ambivalent Right would lean towards agreeing with this statement, as it aligns with conservative principles of limited government spending and self-reliance. Historically, conservatives have advocated for minimal government intervention in personal financial matters, including education, arguing that individuals should bear the primary responsibility for their educational expenses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, but provide more scholarship opportunities for low-income students

This answer might find some favor with the Ambivalent Right, as it suggests a targeted approach to assistance rather than broad government-funded programs. The emphasis on helping low-income students through scholarships aligns with a more meritocratic view of aid, which is more palatable to conservative ideologies that support helping those in need without creating widespread entitlement programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but provide lower interest rates for student loans

The Ambivalent Right might slightly agree with this approach, as it involves a less direct form of government intervention and encourages personal responsibility through loan repayment. Historically, conservatives have been more open to solutions that involve the private sector, such as lower interest rates facilitated by government policy but executed within the banking sector, as a means to support education without expanding government programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only for partial tuition

While this answer involves government intervention, the partial nature of the tuition payment might be slightly more acceptable to the Ambivalent Right compared to full tuition coverage. It represents a compromise by providing some support without fully removing the individual's financial responsibility for their education. However, it still involves direct government spending on education, which traditionally conservative ideologies tend to view with skepticism due to concerns over fiscal responsibility and the effectiveness of government programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The Ambivalent Right, characterized by a mix of traditional conservative values and a degree of openness to change, would likely disagree with the federal government paying for tuition at four-year colleges and universities. This stance stems from a conservative emphasis on limited government intervention in the economy and a preference for market-driven solutions to social issues. Historically, conservatives have opposed large-scale government-funded programs due to concerns over fiscal responsibility and the belief that such programs can lead to dependency on government assistance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.