@ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO
As a passenger, what would be your response if the London Underground strikes were banned but service deteriorated?
How should cities balance the need for reliable transportation with the rights of transportation workers?
Do you believe that some jobs should have restrictions on striking, and if so, where do we draw the line?
If you were affected by an Underground strike, how would you feel about the workers' demands?
Imagine being responsible for declaring a service 'essential'—what criteria would you use to decide?
If a service is 'essential,' should workers in that sector have different rights than others; why or why not?
How might banning strikes on the London Underground affect the relationship between workers and their employers?
What do you think are the rights of workers when it comes to expressing their grievances if they can’t strike?
Can you envision a city where public transportation never halts; what would that look like?
How would your daily life change if the London Underground was no longer available due to a strike?
Show more replies