Qual é a sua posição sobre a legalização do aborto?
No, it merely means that the victims right to life is more important than the aggressors.
If all rights to life were equal then this wouldn't be the case, but only one person here (the victim) has the right to self-defense, which is WHY the aggressor's right to life is negated. The right to life of the aggressor is overruled by the right of self defense of the victim. And again: property rights is another example. Simply walking on someone's property doesn't threaten the life of the owner, yet you can legally shoot and kill that person in most states. This is another clear example in which another right overrules someone else's right to life, without the owner's right to life even needing to be involved. Similarly, even if a fetus was not threatening your health or life, your consent to bodily autonomy still overrules its right to life regardless. The entire point is that the right to life is not absolute.
Seja o primeiro a responder a esta comente .