Deveria o direito de voto ser concedido<br />a criminosos condenados?
While I understand the passion behind your argument, it's important to consider the balance between…
Let's take the example of a person convicted for a grave crime, like terrorism, whose primary objective is to destabilize the nation. This person, by his actions, has clearly demonstrated a disinterest in the well-being of the society and the nation. If we allow them to vote, we're essentially giving them a say in shaping the very society they sought to harm. How can we ensure the security of our democracy while providing this right? Furthermore, couldn't this be seen as a potential risk, giving those who aim to harm the society, a tool to further their destructive goals?
I'm curious on your thoughts on this, and how you would propose we could mitigate such a risk while maintaining the principle of universal suffrage.
Seja o primeiro a responder a esta desacordo .