Should law enforcement be allowed to seize cash and property from suspects without a criminal conviction?
Civil asset forfeiture laws allow police to seize property (cars, cash, homes) they suspect is involved in a crime, even if the owner is never charged or convicted. Originally designed to cripple drug lords, the practice has morphed into a revenue stream for departments, leading to "policing for profit" accusations where officers patrol specifically to seize cash. Proponents argue it’s the only way to dismantle criminal networks that operate outside the traditional justice system. Opponents argue it violates the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause and disproportionately targets low-income communities who can't afford the legal fees to fight for their property back.
Toggle voterbase
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Answer Overview
Response rates from 6.2k America voters.
Historical Support
Trend of support over time for each answer from 6.2k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Historical Importance
Trend of how important this issue is for 6.2k America voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Other Popular Answers
Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@BF4Q57H4 days4D
@95XMKKH 6 days6D
@BDZRQTC2wks2W
@BDZR6KB2wks2W
@BDYC7F22wks2W
@BDXH46F3wks3W
@BDVVMK63wks3W
@BDRNQYH4wks4W
Popular Conversations
Join in on the most popular conversations.
About This Data
Based on 6.2k responses to this question.
These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).
iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.
Cite Or Embed This Poll
Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.





