Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsthe EconomyEmployee RightsCorporate governanceLabor RelationsCo-determinationBoard of Directors•••Started 2mos agoActive 2 days ago

Should large corporations be required to allocate a percentage of their board of directors seats to employee-elected representatives?

Co-determination is a corporate governance model where employees hold a specific percentage of board seats, a practice common in several European countries but largely absent in the United States. Proponents argue that giving workers a formal voice at the highest level of management curtails extreme executive compensation, prevents hostile takeovers, and stabilizes local economies by discouraging offshoring. Opponents argue that legally mandating employee board representation violates the property rights of shareholders, slows down executive decision-making, and could make American companies less competitive in the global market.

+
Expand
+ Settings

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 2.6k America voters.

62%
Yes
38%
No
54%
Yes
33%
No
5%
Yes, workers create the value and deserve a democratic voice in corporate decisions
3%
No, employees should negotiate power through labor unions and collective bargaining instead of board mandates
2%
Yes, but only for publicly traded mega-corporations that dominate local economies
2%
No, shareholders take the financial risk and possess the exclusive right to govern their private property
2%
Yes, the German co-determination model proves this reduces wealth inequality and prevents mass layoffs without hurting profits
1%
No, mandating unqualified workers on boards will cripple corporate agility and drive away investors

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.6k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 2.6k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

  @PoliDummy1776 from Texas  answered…1wk1W

No they should not be required but it is a good practice

 @BDHSG7D from Minnesota  answered…1wk1W

This is so confusing

 @BD8PRN9from Maine  answered…2wks2W

Yes workers create value through Labour and should have control over the desicion in a workplace aswell as ther labour

 @BD4KH7S from Texas  answered…3wks3W

I say only if it helps but if it is with the government supervising the whole thing.

 @BCYKLDG from Alabama  answered…4wks4W

Yes, and all corporations should be required to offer employee stock options

 @BCX6DZQ from Louisiana  answered…1mo1MO

Companies are private and should make the own decisions on most things. This is one of those.

 @BC35YL5 from Florida  answered…2mos2MO

Yes and no. They should have a voice but only for problems that affect a certain location or area, but when it comes to big decisions the company and owners should be the only ones involved

 @BC33WJ2 from Ohio  answered…2mos2MO

We should try as hard as we can to promote a free market with minimal intervention by the government

Popular Conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1yr1Y

Bernie Sanders Charges Ahead As Democrats Stall Out

Bernie Sanders launched a tour in red states like Iowa and Nebraska to rally opposition to Donald Trump’s agenda, drawing massive crowds—thousands in Omaha and overflow audiences in Iowa City.Unlike the Democratic Party’s muted response to Trump’s election, Sanders is actively challenging the administration’s plutocratic policies, focusing on billionaire influence and federal deregulation.In Iowa City, Sanders spoke to packed venues, delivering back-to-back speeches to accommodate attendees, a first in his political career, highlighting his enduring appeal.He criticized Trump’s inner circle, including billionaires Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg, who attended the inauguration, and warned of their control over federal agencies.Sanders galvanized the crowd with historical references—suffrage, slavery, independence—urging grassroots action to counter Trump’s planned $1 trillion tax cuts for the rich and cuts to programs like Medicaid.Attendees expressed frustration with Democratic leaders like Hakeem Jeffries, calling their opposition to Trump weak or nonexistent, while praising Sanders for providing direction.Sanders highlighted the slim Republican House majority (three seats), suggesting constituent pressure could sway vulnerable GOP members to block Trump’s reconciliation bill.Early signs show GOP walkbacks—like Trump’s false claim Medicaid won’t be cut—after outrage over federal grant pauses disrupted services, proving grassroots impact.The crowd, mostly liberal, cheered Sanders’ defense of reproductive rights and jeered Trump’s USAID cuts and Zelensky attacks, though some noted a shift in his base—younger Trump supporters absent.Sanders ended with Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address, framing the fight as a timeless struggle against billionaire rule, inspiring attendees like Audrey to re-engage and Erin to find hope in solidarity.

▲  1917 replies