75%
Yes
25%
No
75%
Yes
25%
No

Historical Results

See how support for each position on “Smart Transportation Infrastructure” has changed over time for 14.6k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

See how importance of “Smart Transportation Infrastructure” has changed over time for 14.6k America voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from America users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.

 @9L4Z23B  from Pennsylvania answered…2mos2MO

 @9NRT9GG from Massachusetts answered…2mos2MO

 @9RDDSGC  from Florida answered…4 days4D

No, while smarter traffic signalling may be a worthwhile investment, I am vehemently opposed to any sort of "smart" vehicles, as they are typically anti-consumer in terms of right-to-repair, as well as an inherent privacy, safety, and security risk to the individual, those around them, and to national security.

"Connected" vehicles of any sort open up the possibility of severe privacy violations by the United States government, as well as malicious individuals and foreign nation states; your car should not be able to transmit data about your location.

Similarly, vehicles wit…  Read more

 @9R4TG9M from Virginia answered…1wk1W

Only in areas that are in need, such as congested cities, and areas where traffic volume is high.

 @9Q7TBHD  from Ohio answered…1wk1W

No; it should be eco-centric and people-centric transportation infrastructure

 @9QZSL9Nfrom Maine answered…1wk1W

...what do you mean by smart? Literally every bloody transport system is already smart, and the UIs for tickets never work!