More Popular Issues
See how voters are siding on other popular political issues...
Results from Income ($150K-$200K) voters
Last answered 52 minutes ago
Distribution of answers submitted by Income ($150K-$200K) voters.
Data includes total votes submitted by visitors since Jan 9, 2014. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
Income data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011).
Choose a demographic filter
* Data estimated by matching users to U.S. Census data block groups via the American Community Survey (2007-2011)
5 years ago by rt.com
5 years ago by net.au
5 years ago by theguardian.com
5 years ago by nytimes.com
5 years ago by net.au
5 years ago by bbc.co.uk
Data based on unique submissions (duplicates or multiple submissions are eliminated) per user using a 30-day moving average to reduce daily variance from traffic sources. Totals may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances.
More stances on this issue
Yes although I cannot rely on reports of scientific research concerning results of said fracking so hard to answer definitively. 6 years ago from a Green in Houston, TX
No absolutely not. all current sites should be shut down and completely cleaned up and restore
to its pristine original conditions. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Brisbane, CA
Yes, with greatly increased oversight but while also pursing renewable sources of energy such as solar, hydro, and wind power. 6 years ago from a Green in Macomb, MI
I believe it is important for both our economy and current country affairs to continue to extract resources to fuel production and economy. However, fracking may not be the best choice. If it is the best choice for certain circumstances and it is needed... 6 years ago from a Republican in Arroyo Grande, CA
Yes, until we currently have no evidence that the harm is greater than the benefit. 6 years ago from a Republican in Houston, TX
Yes, but increase protection for private property in the vicinity and hold businesses liable for any long-term damage to surrounding properties. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Lehman, PA
No more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking, and regardless, we should pursue more sustainable energy sources instead. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Draper, UT
Yes, but with unbiased testing, and not in highly populated areas, and with excessive oversight. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Sun City, AZ
More oversight is needed, and improve methods to insure the environment is protected without polluting the water, etc. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Laveen, AZ
I support requiring disclosure of the chemicals used in fracking fluids and removing the oil and gas industry exemption from the Safe Drinking Water Act. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Brookline, MA
Yes but more needs to be done for the people being affected by the process. 6 years ago from a Libertarian in Portland, CT
Yes, but we should also pursue more sustainable energy sources and do more research to measure long term effects of fracking and stop if we find it problematic,. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Southampton, PA
I think it is a viable way to extract energy, but I question the effect it may be having on groundwater, etc. 6 years ago from a Republican in Kennedale, TX
Yes, but only if it is closely monitored and companies will be held accountable and pay heavy fines if aquifers are damaged or the ground is made unstable. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Knotts Island, VA
Yes... this is complicated. 6 years ago from a Democrat in Bala Cynwyd, PA