Should the U.S. conduct military strikes against North Korea in order to destroy their long-range missile and nuclear weapons capabilities?
In January of 2016, North Korea announced that it detonated its first hydrogen bomb. CBS News reported that the U.S. intelligence community is skeptical that North Korea used a thermonuclear device. The blast was in single-digit kilotons, and a thermonuclear device is measured in megatons. North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, has been more ambitious than his father in the pursuit of long-range missiles and nuclear weapons, even in the face of warnings from China. Proponents of military strikes argue that North Korea crossed a line with its latest test and must be stopped at all costs. Opponents argue that North Korea repeatedly lies about its missile capabilities and that the we should let other countries in the region, such as China and South Korea, address this issue.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Zipcode
Response rates from 48.8k Green Party voters.
Trend of support over time for each answer from 48.8k Green Party voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 48.8k Green Party voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Green Party voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@8HW6GDC6yrs6Y
@3PYYHYS6yrs6Y
@3PZ5G5K6yrs6Y
Like Iran military strikes will be ineffective because we have dithered so long they are now extremely well protected from a military strike; we should asymmetrically attack N Korea and Iran to destroy their nuclear program(s). Cyber attack, infiltration of components that don't work, assassination of key personnel, we should do everything at our disposal to stop these people whose stated intention is to kill us for being us.
@3PY7Y5P6yrs6Y
@3PXRYXK6yrs6Y
@3PZ2BFT6yrs6Y
Deleted4yrs4Y
@3PXX3SH6yrs6Y
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “North Korea Military Strikes” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.