Z jaką ideologią polityczną najbardziej się identyfikujesz?
If my beliefs are so utterly baseless and absurd and reactionary, why is it so difficult for you to…
If my beliefs are so utterly baseless and absurd and reactionary, why is it so difficult for you to disprove them?
It's not. It's actually incredibly easy to disprove many of your claims. Your refusal to accept contradictory evidence is not anyone else's problem. Heck, remember months ago when you and I had a long discussion about evolution vs creationism (along with the reality of anthropogenic climate change), and your claims were so wildly incorrect and absurd that even this site's bot accounts from the Republican Party and other right-wing groups had stepped in to point out sources explaining why your claims were unfounded and wrong? I thought it was hilarious but I guess you really came out of it still believing that "it must be everyone else and their sources that are wrong, not me", huh?
If my beliefs are so utterly baseless and absurd and reactionary, why is it so difficult for you to disprove them?
Like what?
More importantly, you understand that you can argue a position "logically", in which the argument is completely logically sound, but still be blatantly incorrect...right? Just because an argument is logically structured, does NOT make it correct. Facts determine correctness, not logic. You can take untrue claims and still posit an argument using proper logic, yet the incorrect facts still make your logical claim wrong. You keep assuming that anything you say is correct so long as you make a logical argument to get there (even when you don't use proper logic), but that's not how factual claims work.
For example:
-"The sun is white. The sun is a star. Therefore, stars can be white." uses proper logic and also is factually correct, hence the claim is correct.
-"The sun is purple. The sun is a star. Therefore, stars can be purple." uses the same proper logic but is NOT factually correct, hence the claim is incorrect.
Logic doesn't make a claim true, supporting facts do. Your obsession with logic as the inherent arbiter of truth is blinding you from that...
Bądź pierwszy odpowiedzieć do tej niezgoda