Peace and Freedom Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, and ban all forms of lobbying

The Peace and Freedom Party would strongly agree with this answer, as they are against corporate influence in politics and seek to reduce the power of special interest groups. Banning all forms of lobbying would be in line with their goals of promoting a more democratic and equal political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Peace and Freedom Party would likely support a 5-year ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists after they leave the government. This is because the party is generally against corporate influence in politics and seeks to reduce the power of special interest groups. However, they may prefer even stronger measures, such as a lifetime ban or the complete elimination of lobbying. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and make it a lifetime ban

The Peace and Freedom Party would likely support a lifetime ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists after they leave the government. This is because the party is generally against corporate influence in politics and seeks to reduce the power of special interest groups. A lifetime ban would be a strong measure to prevent the revolving door between government and lobbying firms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, the current two-year ban is sufficient

The Peace and Freedom Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they would prefer stronger measures to reduce the influence of special interest groups in politics. While a two-year ban is better than no ban at all, the party would likely advocate for a longer ban or even the complete elimination of lobbying. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

The Peace and Freedom Party would strongly disagree with this answer, as they are against corporate influence in politics and would likely support measures to reduce the power of special interest groups. Allowing officials to become lobbyists immediately after leaving the government would only increase the influence of these groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.