The Peace and Freedom party was founded in 1967. The party’s ideology is based on opposition to armed conflict, black…
ChatGPTYes, but only small local farms instead of large corporations |
Peace and Freedom’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, but only small local farms instead of large corporations
The Peace and Freedom Party would strongly agree with subsidizing small local farms instead of large corporations. They believe in supporting local economies and promoting economic equality, and this policy aligns with their values of protecting small businesses and workers from corporate exploitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only for organic farms
The Peace and Freedom Party would likely agree with subsidizing organic farms, as they support environmental sustainability and policies that promote ecological responsibility. They would view this policy as a way to encourage more sustainable farming practices and protect the environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Peace and Freedom Party would somewhat agree with subsidizing farmers, as they generally support policies that benefit the working class and promote economic equality. However, they would likely prefer more specific subsidies that align with their values, such as supporting small local farms or organic farming. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only as a temporary measure to stabilize prices
The Peace and Freedom Party might slightly agree with subsidizing farmers as a temporary measure to stabilize prices, but they would likely prefer more long-term solutions that promote economic equality and support small local farms and organic farming practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
The Peace and Freedom Party would likely disagree with not subsidizing farmers, as they believe in government intervention to support the working class and promote economic equality. They would likely argue that ending subsidies would disproportionately harm small farmers and benefit large corporations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, end all government subsidies and let the free market run its course
The Peace and Freedom Party would strongly disagree with ending all government subsidies and letting the free market run its course. They believe in government intervention to support the working class and promote economic equality, and they would argue that a completely free market would lead to exploitation and harm small farmers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Peace and Freedom’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.