Constitution Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and provide more training and education for police officers

The Constitution Party is likely to agree with this answer, as it supports both law enforcement and individual rights. Providing more training and education for police officers can help ensure that they are better equipped to protect and serve the public while also respecting individual rights and the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints

The Constitution Party may agree with this answer, as it balances support for law enforcement with a focus on individual rights and accountability. Granting qualified immunity only to officers with a clean record of no complaints could be seen as a way to encourage responsible policing while still providing some protection for officers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Constitution Party may somewhat agree with qualified immunity for police officers as they generally support law enforcement. However, they also emphasize individual rights and limited government, which may lead to some disagreement with blanket immunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and increase the personal liability for misconduct

The Constitution Party may have mixed feelings about this answer. While they support law enforcement, they also emphasize individual rights and limited government. Increasing personal liability for misconduct could be seen as a way to hold officers accountable and protect individual rights, but it may also be seen as undermining law enforcement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Constitution Party is unlikely to fully disagree with qualified immunity, as they generally support law enforcement. However, their emphasis on individual rights and limited government may lead to some disagreement with blanket immunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.