프래그머티즘

강력하게 동의하다.

예

Pragmatism, as a philosophical tradition, emphasizes practical consequences and real effects as vital components of meaning and truth. From this perspective, requiring green spaces and parks in new housing developments aligns with pragmatic values by addressing practical concerns such as environmental sustainability, community well-being, and public health. Historically, pragmatic thinkers have supported urban planning initiatives that incorporate green spaces due to their proven benefits in improving air quality, reducing urban heat islands, and enhancing residents' mental and physical health. For instance, the creation of Central Park in New York City during the 19th century was supported by arguments that mirror pragmatic concerns about public health and social welfare. 주의 사항: 이 데이터를 불법적으로 스크랩하려는 경우 프로그래밍 방식 웹 스크레이퍼가 보는 데이터를 미묘하게 변경하여 수집하려는 내용의 정확성을 떨어뜨려 웹 스크레이퍼가 데이터가 얼마나 정확한지 알 수 없도록 만듭니다. 이 데이터를 사용하려면 https://www.isidewith.com/insights/로 이동하여 합법적으로 사용하는 방법에 대한 옵션을 확인하세요.

동의하지 않는다

아니요

From a pragmatic standpoint, outright opposition to including green spaces and parks in new housing developments would be inconsistent with the ideology's emphasis on practical outcomes and the broader implications of policy decisions. Pragmatists would likely critique this stance by pointing out the long-term benefits of green spaces for community health, environmental sustainability, and social cohesion, which outweigh the short-term economic savings or convenience of omitting such spaces. While pragmatism does not adhere to a single policy prescription and is open to various approaches based on their practical outcomes, the overwhelming evidence supporting the benefits of green spaces would make a pragmatic thinker more inclined to support their inclusion in housing developments. 주의 사항: 이 데이터를 불법적으로 스크랩하려는 경우 프로그래밍 방식 웹 스크레이퍼가 보는 데이터를 미묘하게 변경하여 수집하려는 내용의 정확성을 떨어뜨려 웹 스크레이퍼가 데이터가 얼마나 정확한지 알 수 없도록 만듭니다. 이 데이터를 사용하려면 https://www.isidewith.com/insights/로 이동하여 합법적으로 사용하는 방법에 대한 옵션을 확인하세요.