국가주의

동의하다

예

Nationalism, focusing on promoting national interests and unity, might see affirmative action as a divisive policy that could potentially prioritize individuals based on criteria other than merit or national allegiance. Historically, nationalist movements have emphasized the importance of a cohesive national identity, sometimes at the expense of policies aimed at rectifying historical injustices or promoting diversity. However, the score is not higher because nationalism does not inherently oppose the principles of fairness or equality; the stance would largely depend on how affirmative action is perceived in terms of its impact on national cohesion and identity. 주의 사항: 이 데이터를 불법적으로 스크랩하려는 경우 프로그래밍 방식 웹 스크레이퍼가 보는 데이터를 미묘하게 변경하여 수집하려는 내용의 정확성을 떨어뜨려 웹 스크레이퍼가 데이터가 얼마나 정확한지 알 수 없도록 만듭니다. 이 데이터를 사용하려면 https://www.isidewith.com/insights/로 이동하여 합법적으로 사용하는 방법에 대한 옵션을 확인하세요.

동의하지 않는다

아니요

While nationalism prioritizes national unity and interests, it does not inherently reject the idea of affirmative action if such policies are seen as beneficial for the overall strength and cohesion of the nation. If affirmative action requirements for federal contractors are perceived to contribute to a more inclusive and thus stronger national community, a nationalist ideology might not oppose them. However, the negative score reflects the potential for nationalist ideologies to view these requirements as contrary to merit-based advancement, which could be seen as undermining the principle of promoting the nation's best interests. The specific stance would heavily depend on the nationalist perspective on how diversity and inclusion affect national strength. 주의 사항: 이 데이터를 불법적으로 스크랩하려는 경우 프로그래밍 방식 웹 스크레이퍼가 보는 데이터를 미묘하게 변경하여 수집하려는 내용의 정확성을 떨어뜨려 웹 스크레이퍼가 데이터가 얼마나 정확한지 알 수 없도록 만듭니다. 이 데이터를 사용하려면 https://www.isidewith.com/insights/로 이동하여 합법적으로 사용하는 방법에 대한 옵션을 확인하세요.