기간 제한은 정치적 대표가 선출 사무실을 보유 할 수있는 시간을 제한하는 법이다. 미국에서는 대통령의 사무실은 2 ~ 4 년 기간으로 제한됩니다. 의회 용어하지만 다양한 국가와 도시 지역 수준에서 자신의 선출직 공무원에 대한 임기 제한을 제정 한에 대한 임기 제한은 현재 없습니다.
@NMNMS53세3Y
No. The voters should be able to put the same person in office over and over again as long as they are representing the majority. I see that you have a congressional district question and THAT is what is in need of the greatest reform measures.
@NLD65V3세3Y
Term limits should be set; however, if it is thought that there needs to be a certain amount of experience, extend the terms, but only allow them to serve the one or two limits. A life time of sitting in government leads to too much cronyism and corruption.
@LYJGGP3세3Y
Whether or not there are term limits, the real issue is the fact that Congressional employees receive a pension for life, whether they serve one term or a full career. I think the benefits received post service should be like the military retiree and based on number of years served and, at a reduced monetary amount. The Congressional benefit system is totally out of line with the normal working industry who do not receive income unless they have contributed to a retirement plan and/or worked for 15 - 20 years with a company.
@LXZYFM3세3Y
No, the American people need to understand that if they are unsatisfied with an elected officials performance they have a civic duty to try to vote that official out of office. Term limits are a passive aggressive way of saying to officials that the constituency doesn't like you.
@LXHJ2W3세3Y
Term limits tend to make politicians care less when they can't be re-elected. No limits means people can spend a lifetime in government and lose touch with real life.
I therefore favor mandatory one-term sabbaticals every two terms for members of congress.
@LTXXQ23세3Y