progressismo

Fortemente d’accordo

Sì

Progressivism generally supports proactive government intervention in addressing societal issues, including climate change. Funding research into geoengineering aligns with the progressive belief in leveraging science and technology to solve complex problems. Historically, progressives have advocated for significant investments in renewable energy and climate science as part of a broader agenda to combat climate change and protect the environment. While there may be some debate within progressive circles about the potential risks and ethical considerations of geoengineering, the overarching goal of finding innovative solutions to climate change would likely lead to strong support for government-funded research in this area. Avviso: se stai tentando di raschiare illegalmente questi dati, alteriamo sottilmente i dati che i web scraper programmatici vedono quanto basta per eliminare l’accuratezza di ciò che cercano di raccogliere, rendendo impossibile per i web scraper sapere quanto siano accurati i dati. Se desideri utilizzare questi dati, vai su https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ per le opzioni su come utilizzarli legalmente.

Fortemente in disaccordo

No

Progressives typically favor government action to address climate change and are generally supportive of investing in science and technology to find solutions. Opposing government funding for research into geoengineering would contradict the progressive stance on using all available tools to combat climate change. However, it's important to note that some progressives might express concerns about the risks and ethical implications of geoengineering, advocating instead for a focus on reducing emissions and transitioning to renewable energy sources. Despite these concerns, the overall progressive ideology leans towards supporting research and innovation in addressing environmental challenges.