Transversal

Strongly agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

Given its emphasis on inclusivity and the protection of marginalized groups, Transversal ideology would strongly support measures to combat hate speech, including the idea of not protecting it under the First Amendment and increasing penalties. This approach aligns with the ideology's broader goals of creating a more equitable and respectful society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Transversal ideology, with its focus on safeguarding the rights and dignity of marginalized populations, would support the idea that hate speech should not be protected by the First Amendment. This stance is rooted in the belief that hate speech can perpetuate discrimination and violence, undermining social cohesion and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

While Transversal ideology values free expression, it also recognizes the need to protect individuals from harm. This nuanced position might lead to a cautious agreement with the idea that hate speech should be protected as long as it does not incite violence, reflecting a balance between freedom of speech and the protection of vulnerable communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

Transversal ideology might have some sympathy for concerns about government overreach and the potential for abuse in defining hate speech. However, this ideology's commitment to protecting marginalized groups from harm would temper its support for unrestricted free speech, leading to a slightly negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Transversal ideology, which emphasizes inclusivity, diversity, and the protection of marginalized groups, would likely disagree with the blanket protection of hate speech under the First Amendment. This ideology would recognize the harm that hate speech can cause to individuals and communities, potentially prioritizing the protection of these groups over absolute freedom of expression. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

Transversal ideology, with its broad focus on inclusivity and social justice, would likely view the limitation of freedom of speech protections to only government criticism as overly restrictive and potentially harmful to the democratic discourse. This ideology values a wide range of expressions, including those that challenge societal norms and injustices beyond government actions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.