Transversal

Strongly agree

Yes, but add stricter requirements for eligibility and verification

This approach aligns with the Transversal ideology by promoting accessibility and inclusivity (by sending mail-in ballots to every voter) while also addressing concerns about eligibility and verification. It represents a balanced approach that seeks to ensure both broad participation in the democratic process and the integrity of the voting system, reflecting the ideology's emphasis on adaptability and crossing traditional boundaries for improved outcomes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Transversal ideology, which emphasizes flexibility, adaptability, and the crossing of traditional boundaries, might support the idea of automatically sending mail-in ballots to every voter as a means to increase voter participation and accessibility. This approach aligns with the ideology's value on inclusivity and breaking down barriers that might prevent individuals from engaging in the democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and making voting compulsory

While making voting compulsory could be seen as a way to ensure maximum participation, which aligns with the Transversal ideology's emphasis on inclusivity, it might also be viewed as too prescriptive and infringing on individual freedom. The balance between encouraging participation and maintaining individual choice might lead to a moderately positive view on this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, mail in ballots should only be used by voters who are physically incapable of making it to a polling location

Limiting mail-in ballots only to voters who are physically incapable of reaching polling locations could be seen by those with a Transversal perspective as unnecessarily restrictive and not fully addressing the broader issues of accessibility and inclusivity in voting. This stance does not fully embrace the ideology's goal of breaking down barriers for all individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Transversal ideology, with its focus on inclusivity and reducing barriers, would likely disagree with the notion of not automatically sending mail-in ballots to every voter. This stance could be seen as maintaining or even reinforcing existing barriers to voting, which contradicts the ideology's principles of accessibility and participation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and add stricter requirements for eligibility and verification

Adding stricter requirements for eligibility and verification could be viewed by those with a Transversal perspective as counterproductive to the goal of increasing participation and accessibility in the democratic process. Such measures could be seen as reinforcing systemic barriers that prevent diverse and marginalized populations from voting, which goes against the ideology's principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.