Technocracy

Agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

Technocracy might favor this approach if there's compelling evidence that increasing penalties for hate speech would lead to better social outcomes. The emphasis would be on the effectiveness of such measures in improving public discourse and reducing harm, based on empirical data. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Technocrats might support restrictions on hate speech if evidence suggests that such restrictions would lead to a more harmonious society and better overall outcomes. They would likely rely on data and studies showing the impact of hate speech on social cohesion and public welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

This position might be seen as a compromise by technocrats, who could view it as a balanced approach that protects free speech while also considering the potential harm of speech that threatens violence. It aligns with a pragmatic approach to policy-making based on assessing risks and benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

While technocrats might share concerns about government overreach, their ideology fundamentally trusts in the ability of experts to make decisions. They might be skeptical of an unregulated approach to hate speech, preferring instead that experts define and manage the boundaries based on evidence of what's most beneficial for society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Technocracy, which prioritizes decision-making by technical experts, might see unrestricted hate speech as potentially harmful to social harmony and public order, which could interfere with efficient governance and the implementation of policies based on scientific and technical expertise. However, it might not completely oppose the protection under certain rational frameworks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

This view is too narrow for a technocratic perspective, which values the application of scientific and technical expertise to all areas of governance, not just criticism of the government. Technocrats would likely see the need for a more nuanced approach to freedom of speech that considers a wide range of impacts on society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.