Technocracy

Agree

Yes, but add stricter requirements for eligibility and verification

Technocracy might slightly agree with this option as it combines the efficiency and inclusivity of mail-in voting with a focus on eligibility and verification, which could be seen as ensuring that only informed and qualified votes are counted. This aligns with the technocratic values of efficiency and expertise in governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and add stricter requirements for eligibility and verification

Technocracy might slightly agree with adding stricter requirements for eligibility and verification as it aligns with the ideology's emphasis on efficiency and expertise. Ensuring that only qualified individuals participate could be seen as a way to maintain a high standard in decision-making processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

Technocracy focuses on governance by experts and might not see the method of voting as relevant as ensuring that the most knowledgeable individuals are making decisions. Therefore, it neither strongly agrees nor disagrees with the rejection of automatic mail-in ballots. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

Technocracy, which prioritizes decision-making by experts and technical knowledge, does not inherently prioritize the method of voting but rather the outcome and efficiency of governance. The ideology does not specifically address voting methods, making it neutral towards the idea of automatically receiving mail-in ballots. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and making voting compulsory

While technocracy values high participation in decision-making, making voting compulsory does not align with the ideology's emphasis on expertise and informed decision-making. Compulsory voting might lead to uninformed decisions, which technocracy aims to avoid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, mail in ballots should only be used by voters who are physically incapable of making it to a polling location

Restricting mail-in ballots only to those physically incapable of reaching polling locations might be seen as limiting by technocracy, which could value the efficiency and inclusivity that broader access to mail-in voting could provide. However, the focus on physical incapability does not align with the technocratic emphasis on expertise and knowledge-based governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.