Techno-Progressivism

Strongly agree

Yes

Techno-progressivism generally emphasizes the use of technology and policy to improve the human condition, advocate for social justice, and promote peace. A permanent ceasefire in Gaza aligns with these goals by potentially ending ongoing conflict and facilitating a more stable environment for technological and social progress. Historically, techno-progressives have supported peace initiatives and conflict resolution as means to create a more equitable and sustainable world, viewing continuous conflict as a barrier to progress and human rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Techno-progressivism typically opposes policies or actions that perpetuate conflict or hinder social and technological advancement. Opposing a permanent ceasefire in Gaza would be inconsistent with the ideology's emphasis on peace as a prerequisite for progress. Historically, techno-progressives have been critical of military interventions and conflicts that disrupt social stability and hinder humanitarian efforts, making it unlikely for the ideology to support a stance against a ceasefire. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.