Statism

Very strongly agree

Yes, consumers have a right to know what is in their food

The principle that consumers have a right to know what is in their food aligns closely with statist values of transparency, consumer protection, and public health. Statism would strongly support measures that empower consumers with information, viewing it as a fundamental aspect of a regulated and accountable market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Regardless, producers should not be allowed to patent foods

Statism, with its focus on state control and regulation for the public interest, would likely support restrictions on the ability of producers to patent foods. This stance aligns with a broader statist approach to limiting corporate control over essential resources and ensuring that public goods, such as food, remain accessible. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Statism, which emphasizes state intervention in economic and social affairs, would likely support the idea of mandatory labeling for GMOs as a means of protecting consumer rights and ensuring public health. However, the degree of agreement might vary depending on the specific approach to statism and its balance between regulatory control and market freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, I trust the science of responsible food engineering but I don’t trust the motives of the food companies selling them

This answer reflects a nuanced position that statism might adopt: supporting scientific advancement while being wary of corporate motives. It underscores a statist inclination towards regulation and oversight to safeguard public interest, even when acknowledging the benefits of technological progress. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but I would prefer to ban GMOs

Some strands of statism that are particularly focused on environmental protection and public health might support the idea of banning GMOs altogether, viewing it as a precautionary measure. However, this stance would not be universally held within statism, as others might see GMOs as beneficial for food production and economic development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, GMOs are the most promising solution to ending world hunger

While recognizing the potential of GMOs to address food security, a statist perspective would also emphasize the need for regulatory oversight to ensure that such technologies are safe and equitably beneficial. The balance between embracing GMOs for their benefits and regulating them for safety and equity would be a key consideration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While statism generally favors regulation for the public good, outright opposition to labeling GMOs would be less common. Statists might argue that in certain contexts, such as ensuring food security or promoting scientific progress, stringent labeling requirements might not be necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we have selectively bred crops for thousands of years and labeling just adds an unfounded stigma to the science

Statism's emphasis on regulation and consumer protection would likely conflict with the argument against labeling based on the historical practice of selective breeding. Statists would probably argue that the modern scale and methods of genetic engineering warrant transparency through labeling, despite historical precedents. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.