Social Equality

Strongly agree

Yes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test

This answer aligns well with social equality principles by advocating for a universal standard that applies to politicians of all ages, thereby promoting fairness and competence in governance without discriminating based on age. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

From a social equality perspective, ensuring that politicians are mentally competent to serve could be seen as a measure to maintain a high standard of governance. However, focusing solely on age as a criterion might be viewed as somewhat discriminatory without considering the overall capability and experience of the individual. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, I would prefer term limits instead

Term limits could be seen as a way to promote diversity and renewal within political bodies, which aligns with social equality goals. However, it doesn't directly address the issue of mental competency, which is also important. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, our government needs experienced leaders

Experience is indeed valuable, but from a social equality standpoint, the emphasis might be more on ensuring that all politicians, regardless of their experience level, are mentally fit to serve, balancing experience with competency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Social equality ideologies might slightly disagree with this statement because it overlooks the potential benefits of ensuring that all politicians, regardless of age, meet a certain standard of mental competency to serve effectively. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, mental competency is too subjective and the testing process could be abused

While acknowledging the potential for abuse in mental competency testing is valid, completely dismissing the idea might not align well with the social equality aim of ensuring capable governance. A balanced approach that safeguards against abuse while upholding standards might be more in line with social equality ideals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this discriminates against older politicians

While social equality emphasizes non-discrimination, this stance might be seen as potentially neglecting the importance of ensuring that all politicians are capable of performing their duties effectively, which is crucial for the well-being of society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban anyone over the age of retirement from running for office

This answer could be seen as highly discriminatory from a social equality perspective, as it outright bans individuals based on age, disregarding their potential to contribute effectively to governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.