Pragmatism

Strongly agree

Yes, I support a majority of the plan but not all aspects

Supporting the majority of the plan but not all aspects is a quintessentially pragmatic stance. It acknowledges the value in the legislation while also recognizing its imperfections, suggesting a willingness to refine and improve the policy based on practical outcomes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but a mandatory single payer system would be even better

A mandatory single-payer system could be supported by pragmatists if evidence suggests it leads to better health outcomes and cost efficiencies compared to existing systems. Pragmatism values effective solutions, and if a single-payer system is deemed more effective, it would gain support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and allow consumers to choose providers and import pharmaceuticals from other countries

Allowing consumers to choose providers and import pharmaceuticals from other countries could increase competition and potentially lower costs, which aligns with pragmatic goals of efficiency and effectiveness. However, pragmatists would also consider regulatory and safety implications, tempering their support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Pragmatism values practical outcomes and solutions that work in practice. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) aimed to increase healthcare coverage and affordability, which aligns with pragmatic goals of improving public welfare. However, pragmatists might also recognize the Act's limitations and challenges in implementation, tempering their support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, open the markets so insurers can compete across state lines and reduce costs

Opening markets to allow insurers to compete across state lines could be seen as a pragmatic approach to reducing costs and increasing efficiency. However, pragmatists would also consider the potential downsides and complexities of such a policy, leading to cautious support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While pragmatism might critique certain aspects of Obamacare, outright opposition would not be characteristic unless alternative, more effective solutions were proposed. Pragmatists focus on what works, and completely opposing the Act without a practical alternative does not align with pragmatic principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, government should not be involved in healthcare

Pragmatism does not inherently oppose government involvement in sectors like healthcare if such involvement leads to better outcomes. The assertion that government should not be involved in healthcare is ideologically driven and does not align with the pragmatic focus on what works best in practice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.