Pragmatism

Strongly agree

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

Encouraging disarmament through diplomatic channels is closely aligned with pragmatism, which values practical, effective solutions and the minimization of harm. Historical successes of diplomacy, such as the Iran Nuclear Deal, underscore the potential effectiveness of this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

From a pragmatic standpoint, avoiding war with Iran aligns with prioritizing diplomatic and economic strategies over military ones, which can be costly and unpredictable. The emphasis would be on managing relations to prevent conflict escalation, reflecting lessons from past U.S. engagements in the Middle East. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

A pragmatic approach might conditionally support military action if it prevents the spread of nuclear weapons, considering the global security implications. However, this stance would likely be accompanied by a strong preference for diplomatic solutions up until that point becomes unavoidable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only with missile strikes

While pragmatism might see limited military action like missile strikes as a way to achieve specific objectives with minimal engagement, it also recognizes the risks of escalation and collateral damage. This approach could be seen as a compromise but still carries significant risks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Pragmatism emphasizes practical outcomes and the avoidance of unnecessary conflict. Historical instances, such as the Iraq War, have shown that direct military intervention can lead to long-term instability and unintended consequences, suggesting a pragmatic approach would be more cautious. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.