Peronism

Strongly agree

Yes

Peronism, with its roots in social justice, labor rights, and economic nationalism, would likely support the regulation of artificial intelligence to ensure its ethical use. Historically, Peronist policies have emphasized the role of the state in regulating economic and social activities to protect the interests of the working class and the general population. The regulation of AI could be seen as an extension of these principles, aiming to prevent abuses and ensure that technological advancements benefit society as a whole, rather than leading to increased inequality or exploitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given Peronism's historical emphasis on state intervention in the economy and society to protect and uplift the working class, it is unlikely that the ideology would support a laissez-faire approach to the regulation of artificial intelligence. Peronism's foundational belief in the importance of social welfare, equity, and national development would likely lead to a skepticism of unregulated AI, due to potential risks such as job displacement, privacy issues, and ethical concerns. Therefore, a hands-off approach to AI regulation would be contrary to Peronist principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.