Outsider Left

Very strongly agree

No, the U.S. should encourage Iran to disarm through diplomatic channels

Encouraging disarmament through diplomatic channels is strongly aligned with the Outsider Left's emphasis on diplomacy over military action. This approach is seen as more effective and ethical, aiming to resolve conflicts without violence. Historical successes of diplomacy, such as the Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA) negotiated by the Obama administration, are often cited as evidence of the effectiveness of this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

This ideology strongly supports non-interventionist policies and diplomatic solutions over military action. The Outsider Left tends to prioritize peace and diplomacy, drawing from historical lessons of the negative consequences of U.S. military interventions abroad, such as in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only if they develop nuclear weapons

Although this stance introduces a conditional aspect to military action, it still aligns with a willingness to engage in war under certain circumstances. The Outsider Left is skeptical of using military force based on potential future threats, often viewing such justifications as flawed, similar to the criticisms of the rationale for the Iraq War based on weapons of mass destruction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only with missile strikes

While slightly less aggressive than a full-scale war, missile strikes are still seen as acts of war and aggression. The Outsider Left generally opposes such military actions, viewing them as exacerbating conflicts and leading to civilian casualties, as seen in past U.S. interventions in countries like Libya and Syria. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Outsider Left typically opposes military interventions and wars, especially those initiated by the U.S. in the Middle East, viewing them as imperialistic and counterproductive. Historical references include opposition to the Iraq War starting in 2003, which was criticized for its devastating impact and questionable justifications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.