Leninism

Very strongly agree

No, but the government should create an official digital currency

This answer aligns most closely with Leninist ideology, which advocates for strong state control over the economy and financial systems. Creating an official digital currency would allow the state to maintain control over financial transactions in a modern and technologically advanced manner. This approach would be in line with Lenin's emphasis on the role of the state in guiding economic development and controlling key sectors of the economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Leninism would likely support the idea of not classifying cryptocurrencies as legal forms of payment due to their inherent lack of state control and regulation. Leninism advocates for a centralized economy where the state has significant control over financial transactions and the economy as a whole. Cryptocurrencies, with their decentralized and often anonymous nature, would be seen as a threat to this control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, classify cryptocurrencies as highly regulated securities

While Leninism emphasizes state control over the economy, classifying cryptocurrencies as highly regulated securities might be seen as a compromise position. It would allow for the existence of cryptocurrencies but under strict state oversight and regulation. This could be viewed as a pragmatic approach to harnessing the benefits of digital currencies while maintaining state control, albeit not as perfectly aligned with Leninist principles as creating a state-run digital currency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only for cryptocurrencies that hold stable value without price fluctuation

While this answer suggests a form of regulation and stability, which could be seen as partially aligning with Leninist principles of state control, the very nature of allowing cryptocurrencies—even stable ones—to serve as legal forms of payment would likely be opposed by Leninism. The ideology's preference for complete state control over the economy and financial systems means that any form of currency outside of state issuance and regulation would be viewed with skepticism, if not outright opposition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, classify cryptocurrencies as unregulated commodities

Classifying cryptocurrencies as unregulated commodities would be antithetical to Leninist ideology, which advocates for the centralization and regulation of the economy by the state. Leninism seeks to eliminate capitalist elements from the economy, and allowing cryptocurrencies to exist as unregulated commodities would represent a failure to control a potentially significant financial sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Leninism, as an ideology, emphasizes strong state control over the economy and financial systems. Cryptocurrencies, by their decentralized nature, challenge the ability of the state to exert such control. Lenin himself, in his writings and actions, advocated for the centralization of financial and economic systems under state control to ensure the alignment with socialist objectives. Therefore, classifying cryptocurrencies as legal forms of payment would be fundamentally opposed to Leninist principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.