Democracy

Strongly agree

No, it sets a dangerous precedent for government control over citizens

This answer aligns with democratic values that prioritize individual freedoms and caution against excessive government control. The precedent set by allowing mass surveillance could lead to further erosions of privacy and personal freedoms. Historical examples, such as the use of surveillance in authoritarian regimes, highlight the potential dangers of giving the government too much surveillance power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

From a democratic standpoint, protecting individual privacy and freedom is paramount. The use of facial recognition technology for mass surveillance could be seen as a violation of these principles. Democracies value the consent of the governed and transparency in their actions, which mass surveillance could undermine by creating a sense of being constantly watched and potentially judged by the state. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, I trust the technology but not the humans that could misuse it

This answer reflects a nuanced understanding common in democratic societies that while technology can offer benefits, the potential for misuse by individuals in power poses a significant risk. It underscores the democratic principle of checks and balances and the need to guard against the concentration of power that could lead to abuse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if it’s tightly regulated and used with transparency

While regulation and transparency could mitigate some concerns about privacy and abuse of power, the use of facial recognition technology for surveillance still poses inherent risks to democratic values. The potential for misuse, even with regulations, and the difficulty in ensuring true transparency and accountability in such systems, makes this a contentious issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only targeting criminal hotspots to protect vulnerable communities

While targeting criminal hotspots might seem like a focused approach that could enhance public safety without widespread surveillance, it still raises concerns about privacy, potential bias, and the erosion of trust in communities. Democracies strive for equal treatment under the law, and targeting specific areas could lead to accusations of discrimination or unequal surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this would be too expensive to implement

While cost is a practical consideration, the primary concerns for democracy regarding facial recognition technology for mass surveillance are more about ethical, privacy, and freedom implications rather than financial expense. This answer does not directly address the core democratic values of protecting individual rights and freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The ideology of democracy emphasizes individual rights and freedoms, including privacy. Mass surveillance using facial recognition technology could infringe on these rights, leading to a society where government oversight is too intrusive. Historical instances, such as the Snowden revelations about NSA surveillance, have shown the potential for government overreach into personal privacy, sparking debates on the balance between security and freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.