Ambivalent Right

Agree

Yes, and allow border states to manage their own security policy

This position aligns with the Ambivalent Right's preference for states' rights and localized control over policy, suggesting a belief that border states are better positioned to manage their unique security challenges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Ambivalent Right, characterized by a mix of traditional conservative values and a degree of openness to pragmatic immigration policies, might somewhat agree with increasing restrictions for security reasons but may also see the value in immigration for economic and cultural reasons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, make it easier for immigrants to access temporary work visas

Making it easier for immigrants to access temporary work visas could be seen by the Ambivalent Right as a practical solution to labor shortages and a way to control immigration more effectively, aligning with their pragmatic approach to policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, just enforce the current border policy

While the Ambivalent Right may support the enforcement of current laws, their ambivalence suggests they might also support minor adjustments to policy to better address current realities, making them only slightly in favor of this option. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No

Members of the Ambivalent Right may be divided on this issue, balancing concerns about national security and law enforcement with the benefits of immigration, leading to a neutral stance on further restrictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and we should implement an open border policy

An open border policy is generally opposed by the Ambivalent Right, which, despite its nuanced stance, still prioritizes national security and controlled immigration over completely open borders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.