Try the political quiz

Ambivalent Right policy on terrorism

Topics

Should foreign terrorism suspects be given constitutional rights?

AR>AR  ChatGPTNo, they should be tried in military tribunals but not subject to torture

Ambivalent Right answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

No, they should be tried in military tribunals but not subject to torture

This answer might resonate with the Ambivalent Right as it strikes a balance between ensuring national security and upholding some level of legal standards and human rights. The use of military tribunals for foreign terrorism suspects, while avoiding torture, could be seen as a pragmatic compromise. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

This ideology might lean towards agreeing with this statement due to concerns over national security and the belief that foreign terrorism suspects pose a unique threat that justifies different treatment. However, their ambivalence might stem from a recognition of the importance of due process and legal standards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, they are not U.S. citizens and do not have constitutional rights

This ideology might somewhat agree with the notion that foreign terrorism suspects do not have constitutional rights, based on a traditional view of national sovereignty and citizenship. However, their ambivalence and potential concern for human rights and legal principles might temper their agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, just like U.S. citizens, terrorists should be given a fair trial in federal courts

While the Ambivalent Right may appreciate the importance of fair trials, they might be concerned about the implications of treating foreign terrorism suspects the same as U.S. citizens, especially in terms of national security and the potential for setting precedents that could complicate future terrorism cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Ambivalent Right, which often balances between traditional conservative values and a degree of openness to libertarian or moderate views, might be skeptical about extending constitutional rights to foreign terrorism suspects. Historically, conservative viewpoints have emphasized national security and the potential risks of affording such rights to individuals who are not U.S. citizens and are accused of terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, give them a fair trial and shut down Guantanamo Bay

The call to give foreign terrorism suspects a fair trial and to shut down Guantanamo Bay might be too progressive for the Ambivalent Right, which, despite its occasional openness to moderate views, typically aligns with more conservative stances on national security and the handling of terrorism suspects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Ambivalent Right issues? Take the political quiz to find out.