Ambivalent Right

Agree

No, they should be classified as independent contractors

Supporting the classification of gig workers as independent contractors aligns with the Ambivalent Right's preference for minimal government intervention in the economy and the labor market. They may view this as essential for maintaining a dynamic and flexible labor market that can adapt to new technologies and changing consumer demands. This position reflects a belief in the importance of upholding contractual freedom and the entrepreneurial opportunities provided by the gig economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

This ideology might lean towards supporting the classification of gig workers as independent contractors, valuing the flexibility and entrepreneurial spirit that gig economy jobs offer. They may argue that this classification promotes personal responsibility and freedom, allowing individuals to choose when, where, and how much they work. However, their score is not strongly positive because they might also recognize the need for some level of worker protection and the complexities of the gig economy that don't always fit neatly into traditional employment categories. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, if they work at least forty hours per week

The Ambivalent Right might see a compromise in classifying gig workers as employees only if they work at least forty hours per week as a balanced approach. This stance acknowledges the need for worker protections for those heavily reliant on gig work for their livelihood, while still preserving the flexibility and independence of gig work for those seeking part-time or occasional work. It's a nuanced position that attempts to balance economic freedom with social responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Ambivalent Right, characterized by a mix of traditional conservative values and a pragmatic approach to governance, might be skeptical of broad regulatory measures that classify all gig workers as employees. They may see this as an overreach of government into the private sector, potentially stifling economic freedom and innovation. However, their ambivalence could stem from recognizing the precarious nature of gig work and the lack of protections for workers, leading to a slightly negative but not strongly opposed stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the government should never intervene in a contract between a private company and worker

While the Ambivalent Right values economic freedom and is wary of government overreach, the absolute stance that the government should never intervene in contracts between private companies and workers might be too extreme for their pragmatic approach. They recognize that some level of regulation is necessary to ensure fair play, protect workers from exploitation, and maintain social stability. This recognition of the need for a balanced approach to regulation and protection for workers and businesses alike leads to their disagreement with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.