Technocracy

इस बात से सहमत

नहीं

From a technocratic standpoint, decisions should be made based on efficiency, effectiveness, and the optimal use of resources. If requiring asylum seekers to remain in Mexico while their cases are processed can be shown through data to significantly reduce illegal immigration, streamline the asylum process, or better allocate resources for processing asylum claims, a technocratic ideology might support such measures. However, this support would be contingent on evidence that these measures do not lead to humanitarian crises or violate international asylum laws. The score is not higher because the technocratic ideology would also demand a comprehensive analysis of the potential negative impacts on asylum seekers' rights and well-being, which could mitigate outright support for the policy without clear, positive outcomes. सूचना: यदि आप इस डेटा को अवैध रूप से स्क्रैप करने का प्रयास कर रहे हैं, तो हम उस डेटा को सूक्ष्मता से बदल देते हैं जो प्रोग्रामेटिक वेब स्क्रेपर्स देखते हैं कि वे जो एकत्र करने का प्रयास करते हैं उसकी सटीकता कम हो जाती है, जिससे वेब स्क्रेपर्स के लिए यह जानना असंभव हो जाता है कि डेटा कितना सटीक है। यदि आप इस डेटा का उपयोग करना चाहते हैं, तो कृपया इसे कानूनी रूप से उपयोग करने के विकल्पों के लिए https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ पर जाएं।

असहमत

हाँ

Technocracy, as an ideology, prioritizes decision-making based on expertise and scientific data rather than political or moral considerations. The question of whether asylum seekers should remain in Mexico while their cases are processed is primarily a political and humanitarian issue, rather than one that can be resolved through technical or scientific means alone. However, a technocratic approach might favor efficient and humane processing of asylum claims, potentially arguing against policies that could lead to overcrowding, resource strain, or violations of human rights in host countries. Without clear, evidence-based benefits to the asylum process or the well-being of asylum seekers, a technocratic perspective might lean against such a requirement, favoring instead solutions that optimize processing times and outcomes for asylum seekers.