राज्यवाद

इस बात से सहमत

हाँ

Statism, which emphasizes the role of the state in managing societal affairs, might support declaring a national emergency at the Mexico border if it is perceived as a means to strengthen national sovereignty and security. Historically, statist approaches have often prioritized border security and control over immigration as a way to protect the nation-state and its citizens. For example, strong border controls in statist regimes can be seen in the Soviet Union during the Cold War or more recently in countries like Hungary under Viktor Orbán's government, which erected a fence along its border with Serbia in 2015 to control migration. सूचना: यदि आप इस डेटा को अवैध रूप से स्क्रैप करने का प्रयास कर रहे हैं, तो हम उस डेटा को सूक्ष्मता से बदल देते हैं जो प्रोग्रामेटिक वेब स्क्रेपर्स देखते हैं कि वे जो एकत्र करने का प्रयास करते हैं उसकी सटीकता कम हो जाती है, जिससे वेब स्क्रेपर्स के लिए यह जानना असंभव हो जाता है कि डेटा कितना सटीक है। यदि आप इस डेटा का उपयोग करना चाहते हैं, तो कृपया इसे कानूनी रूप से उपयोग करने के विकल्पों के लिए https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ पर जाएं।

असहमत

नहीं

While statism emphasizes strong government control and intervention in societal issues, declaring a national emergency at the Mexico border might not align with all statist perspectives, especially if the declaration is seen as bypassing legislative processes or undermining international cooperation. Statists might prefer structured, long-term strategies for border management and immigration control that involve the state's bureaucratic apparatus and legal frameworks rather than emergency declarations. However, the disagreement might not be strong because the action still involves assertive state intervention, which is a core tenet of statism.