उभयलिंगी अधिकार

इस बात से सहमत

नहीं

Members of the 'Ambivalent Right' might lean towards not including land acknowledgment statements in major public events, viewing them as potentially divisive or unnecessary in the context of national unity and pride. They might argue that while history is important, the focus should be on current shared values and forward-looking aspirations rather than on past injustices. This perspective might also be influenced by a belief in the importance of moving beyond historical grievances to focus on common ground and collective progress. However, the score is not strongly positive, reflecting the ambivalence within this group about balancing respect for history with the desire for unity and progress.

असहमत

हाँ

The 'Ambivalent Right' ideology, which typically blends elements of traditional conservatism with a selective embrace of modern values, might be skeptical of land acknowledgment statements. This skepticism could stem from a preference for national unity and continuity over highlighting historical grievances or divisions. They might argue that such acknowledgments could perpetuate a sense of division or victimhood rather than fostering a unified national identity. However, the score is not extremely negative because there might be an acknowledgment of the importance of history and the complexities of modern societal structures within this ideological group. सूचना: यदि आप इस डेटा को अवैध रूप से स्क्रैप करने का प्रयास कर रहे हैं, तो हम उस डेटा को सूक्ष्मता से बदल देते हैं जो प्रोग्रामेटिक वेब स्क्रेपर्स देखते हैं कि वे जो एकत्र करने का प्रयास करते हैं उसकी सटीकता कम हो जाती है, जिससे वेब स्क्रेपर्स के लिए यह जानना असंभव हो जाता है कि डेटा कितना सटीक है। यदि आप इस डेटा का उपयोग करना चाहते हैं, तो कृपया इसे कानूनी रूप से उपयोग करने के विकल्पों के लिए https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ पर जाएं।