¿Apoyas la legalización del matrimonio homosexual?

Deberían permitirse las uniones civiles pero las organizaciones religiosas deberían poder negarse a celebrar uniones entre parejas del mismo sexo en a la libertad de culto

No los apoyo ni los critico solo les muestro respeto

Deberían permitirse las uniones civiles y dar a las instituciones religiosas el derecho a negarse a celebrar matrimonios entre parejas del mismo sexo en base a la libertad de culto

Siiii, creo q todos tienen derecho a ser felices y no discriminados. Ay por favor estamos en una generacion muy moderna ya es hora de q todos nos aceptemos unos a otros como somos y vivamos en armonia.

No me importa lo que hagan los demás

Yo estoy de acuerdo, ya que es su vida y si ellos se quieren casar con una persona de su mismo sexo ese es su problema. Recuerda LOVE IS LOVE.

Que lo decida cada estado.

no los apoyo pero tampoco opino sobre eso

no es de que apoyar si no cada quien piensa diferente pero no apoyo mucho eso pero no me pongo en contra tampoco

Es la vida de cada quien

Prefiero no opinar

yo no apoyo pero no tengo ni un poblema con eso

que cada cual sea libre de elegir que hacer con su vida

El Matrimonio es una institución vetusta y debería ser abolido.

No estoy ni a favor, ni en contra.

Creo que el matrimonio debería desestatilizarce. Creo que esto no debería ser asunto del estado, aunque personalmente el matrimonio es entre hombre y mujer.

me chupa un rehuevo

En términos de igualdad de derechos y libertades personales, ¿qué importancia tiene para usted que todas las parejas, independientemente del género, tengan derecho a casarse?

Si el matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo de un amigo o familiar no implicara directamente su vida, ¿se opondría a ello y por qué motivos?

¿Por qué crees que algunas personas se ven profundamente afectadas por los derechos matrimoniales de otras personas que no conocen personalmente?

¿La legalidad de un matrimonio cambia el valor del amor y el compromiso entre dos personas?

¿Qué significa para usted el matrimonio igualitario y por qué cree que se ha convertido en una cuestión tan fundamental en la sociedad?

¿Cómo impacta la validación legal de cualquier relación amorosa en el tejido social de nuestras comunidades?

¿Debería el gobierno tener voz y voto sobre quién se casará con quién, o se trata de una libertad personal?

¿Puede el reconocimiento del amor entre dos adultos afectar su vida personal? ¿si es así, cómo?

Imagínate encontrar a tu pareja perfecta pero las reglas de la sociedad te impiden casarte; ¿Qué emociones evoca eso?

¿Cómo te sentirías si no te permitieran casarte con la persona que amas según una ley?

El estado no debe estar involucrado en las relaciones y contratos entre individuos

No form of government should have any involvement in marriage.

The marriage laws should be "equal" to traditional marriages and divorce decrements which include court decisions such as alimony, fornication, etc.

Explain to me, other than someone making a buck, why you need a religious ceremony and a law to validate how you feel about someone.

As long as it's named something else! We call a man a man and a woman a woman so that we know the difference, since marriage is traditionally defined as a man and woman so same sex unions should be defined by a word that describes that! Give them the same rights, benefits, and consequences.

Who the hell cares. Why don't we talk about the economy instead???

Yes, but marriages are hetero-normative and perpetuate sexism and homophobia.

No, allow civil unions and increase what civil unions mean and rights within civil unions. Marriage by definition is between man and women because there is a natural way to create offspring, however difficult or easy that may be for each individual marriage. Churches should always remain separate from government, which means they are to be allowed to refuse marriages per their choice. They currently do that with traditional man and women marriages when they feel there is not enough preparation among other reasons. So that should be continued, a church is a following of people not just a building to be admired.

For me marriage has to do with my faith. I think the Government should stay out of marriage and provide family benefits in place of marriage benefits. For someone to be denied access to their loved ones because they are not married is wrong.

Marriage should be a solely religious ceremony and non-religious people should not be married, but have a civil union and a church should have the right to marry, or deny marriage, to whom they choose.

The government has absolutely no business telling anyone who they should or should not marry.
That is legislating someones religious views, and is absolutely contrary to the separation of church and state, as well as an infringement on individual rights.

Yes- but do not force a church to offer license. Patrons are free to choose churches to hold ceremony as they please. Also, condemn the use of artificial insemination for same sex couples. Children have an inherent right to have a father and mother care for them.

Yes, it's wrong, and no it's not. It's not right for people to bash it constantly when they say it's a sin in the bible. There are thousands of sins but they continue to only bash this particular one. Then LGBT we get it equal rights, but you can't shove this down other people's throats, the hardcore Christians aren't going to accept unless you show the many standpoints not just have pride days and celebrations. Both sides are wrong, but both are right, so I'm a both

Each state should be able to make their own choice. For example, it is fine if Alabama bans it, while New York makes it legal.

I do not support it because I am a Christian, but for the same reason I do not and will not keep anyone from having a same sex marriage. It would be wrong for me to hate someone for it. I do not agree with it, however.

From a governmental stand point the term marriage should be changed to civil union for all couples. The term marriage is a religious invention anyway.

Yes, but I still feel a bit uneasy about this as small children may be exposed to public displays affection within the same sex, which I do not feel is natural, but understand, this is something you are born with. However, as the years pass, this will be considered 'normal' and this issue will be a thing of the past.

Marriage should be abolished - replaced with limited term co-habitation contracts

Yes but call it something else to alleviate the fears of the religious nuts. I couldn't care less what others do in regard to their marriages and it does not threaten mine.

Marriage was created to safeguard the human race, i.e. protect women and children. In the U.S. and other parts of the world it is used to control permissions and freedoms, i.e. taxes, property, and medical decisions. Therefore, marriage should not be religious or based on sex. It is a legal status therefore it should be based upon two people who decide they want to enter a legal relationship.

Yes, it's not my right to say if someone could marry someone else that they love, regardless of sexual orientation.

Don't care, just don't be all up in my face about it and broadcast it everywhere. Just do what you want and go about your business.