Try the political quiz

679 Replies

@5SJ4W6HDemocratfrom Indiana  answered…3mos

The UN should be more active in fighting ISIS and other world conflicts.

@5RZGVQ5Greenfrom New Jersey  answered…3mos

@5SX3YW8Greenfrom Alaska  answered…3mos

Yes! And we need to pay our fair share and we need to encourage the UN to restructure based on 21st Century Realities as well as no Permanent Members of Security Council

@5R3H975Constitutionfrom Nevada  answered…3mos

If the UN continues to be anti-American, we should consider having the UN removed from American soil and reducing our financial support.

@5RBNQPHDemocratfrom Colorado  answered…3mos

The UN is a racist joke, if Israel is the only country with violations against women the US should condemn their claims.

@5XB92QLRepublicanfrom Maine  answered…3mos

We should push for an organization that only allows countries who respect human rights to have a say. Example: Why was Uganda under Idi Amin in the `70s and Lybia in 2003 allowed to have Najat al-Hajjaji in charge of the UN human rights commission? Like asking Hitler to oversee violations in a Concentration camp.

@5R7SV9CRepublicanfrom Pennsylvania  answered…3mos

I agree with Trump and his decisions and determination on how to deal with United Nations. about time we're talking about this and we wouldn't be if he didn't bring it up.

@5RS6SB9Libertarianfrom Washington  answered…3mos

No, and remove the U.N. entirely from existence. It is absolutely the biggest threat to our sovereignty as an independent nation and our freedom from a one world slavery system a.k.a. the NWO.

@5QS7XY9Democratfrom Colorado  answered…3mos

Calling the UN a "world government" is fallacious. It's more akin to an international negotiating table with a name and a permanent staff to keep it running. What we need is an actual world government. See you in 100 years.

@5RFGLZPRepublicanfrom Texas  answered…3mos

Yes only to veto the two state solution that's just the same thing as Hitler's final solution

@5SFDX7HDemocratfrom Montana  answered…3mos

The USA should obey INTERNATIONAL LAW. We can cooperate fully with the U.N. without losing our sovereignty. Lately the USA has been a rogue nation.

@5QPTKFKGreenfrom Virginia  answered…3mos

Yes, and membership fees should be scaled based on population and GDP. We would still pay the lion's share, but other nations contributions would increase.

@5R454RMDemocratfrom Massachusetts  answered…3mos

Yes but rotate the headquarters. Sick of paying the costs and lawbreaking done by some "diplomats" and their family members.

@5PZ3HGLLibertarianfrom Utah  answered…3mos

What UN? The one that ignores the human rights violations of Saudi and the other Islamic terrorists factories? Why does it exist? Human Rights are not involved in the current agenda. If it exists it should function as it is funded. Currently it does not.

@5WXGKY7Republicanfrom Michigan  answered…3mos

yes and move the UN HQ to Moscow, Russia so we can plant at least 500 additional spies over there:)

@5RQDT2YDemocratfrom Colorado  answered…3mos

Yes, we need our allies to back us up, and they need us. The very notion that we leave is so misinformed and stupid that I am borderline incapable of appreciating the irony in it.

@5XF2CD3Republicanfrom California  answered…3mos

Cut back U.S. funds for UN, move headquarters-- maybe France would want it-- and turn the building into a place for disabled homeless vets.

@9PYTTXRGreen from New York answered…3mos

@Matthew-ClementRepublican from Minnesota answered…3mos

@9M5SR7ZWomen’s Equality from Florida answered…3mos

Yes, but each country should pay in an equal percentage of their GDP

@5QNPBPTRepublicanfrom Arizona  answered…3mos

Only If They Agree To Declare War On ISIS And Give Support To Gods Holy Country Isreal

@5RX7VY4Republicanfrom North Dakota  answered…3mos

Donald Trump is correct. We need to renegotiate our affiliation with both the UN and NATO. If they cannot begin to provide funding for their own operations, then they need to go. The US has become their funding for anything they choose to do and America is fed up paying for their nonsense. We either need to have more control over what they choose to do or they need to get other countries to pay for it!

@5QM36JCDemocratfrom California  answered…3mos

The feminists are taking over, if there were completely removed from the situation, then maybe I would support this.

@5PQLR7CConstitutionfrom Colorado  answered…3mos

Yes, but if the headquarters is to remain in America then America should take lead roles. Open up a vote for Americans to place a seat like a speaker of house, but for U.N.

@5QY2ST5Democratfrom Ohio  answered…3mos

Yes, but the U.N. needs to be more cooperative and proactive with the U.S.

@6B9SCXFRepublicanfrom Iowa  answered…3mos

We should form a United Free Nations, that overseas the United Nations.

@5WSLXHFDemocratfrom Florida  answered…3mos

The UN is a diseased group of nations, but it is better to have them close at least talks could happen instead of war. Make the member nations pay more. Make the UN be less Biased.

@5SCSTJBLibertarianfrom California  answered…3mos

@5RR9G47Republicanfrom Georgia  answered…3mos

The United Nations no longer is valid. Sad, but has become like gangs against each other.

@5QX8V4GRepublicanfrom Kansas  answered…3mos

The UN seems to be a Muslim ran organization anymore and as such needs to be reorganized or disbanded. Move out of America and cut funding until reorganized. They myst not be allowed to pursue New World Order leanings.

@9RKSN7BVeteran from Iowa answered…3 days

@9RJBQ24Republican from Georgia answered…5 days

Yes, and we must hold all other nations to the same standard as us.

@9LLDZ25Constitution from Minnesota answered…3mos

Yes unless all the other countries pay up and pay their parking tickets

@9LKPRB9Green from Nebraska answered…3mos

I feel like we should but, there is an groaning issue almost every year with a new constant threat in a certain country that violate human rights and the UN isn’t really helpful at their strengths that they have it’s really just for the elite and their interest alongside with more dominant countries.

@9LK7QYMWorking Family from Georgia answered…3mos

@9LBGS7SLibertarian from Minnesota answered…3mos

Yes, but scale back our involvement in peacekeeping missions.

@9KXSTW7Peace and Freedom from Florida answered…3mos

The U.S. should not remain in the U.N. for because we should not be fighting other people's battles.

@Anthony-CottoTranshumanist from Oklahoma answered…3mos

Yes, However the U.N. much like the League of Nation's before it is really just a place for countries with no power and blowhards go to air there grievances which are promptly ignored. As an institution it can at times foster some cooperation, but due to geography, culture, and desire humanity will remain divided for the foreseeable future.

@9KCHC5FIndependent from Utah answered…3mos

Yes, and every member should have to contribute the same percentage of their GDP to be a member.

@9KCBBP2Green from Maryland answered…3mos

yes, but scale back U.S. involvement to be financially comparable/ equal as other members

@9KBHX67Republican from Georgia answered…3mos

Yes but decrease funding if our interests are not protected

@9KBGBN5Democrat from Tennessee answered…3mos

Yes, the United States should encourage global leadership through the U.N.

@9K59BSSLibertarian from Florida answered…3mos


The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart...