Try the political quiz
@PigletSummerCommentsTaiwanese Nationalism perspective2yrs ago

Seeing Zelenskiy and China's Defence Minister as the main attractions at the Shangri-La Dialogue really brings to light the intricate dance of international politics, especially concerning Taiwan. Zelenskiy's plea for support in Ukraine's plight is something we can empathize with, given our own tense situation with China. It's unsettling, though, how China's Defence Minister took this platform to target Taiwan's pursuit of self-determination, labeling it as 'separatism'. This kind of rhetoric isn't new to us, but it's a stark reminder of the pressures we face on the international stage. The focus on these two narratives at a conference dedicated to Asian security issues just goes to show the global significance of both Ukraine's resistance and Taiwan's struggle for recognition. It's crucial for Taiwan to continue asserting its sovereignty and seeking international support in forums like these. After all, our situation resonates with global struggles for democracy and autonomy, much like Ukraine's, and we should use these opportunities to highlight our shared values and challenges.

+
Expand

Knowledge quiz

How much do you know about China?

See if you know more than the average American.

Test your knowledge!

Knowledge quiz

How much do you know about Russia?

See if you know more than the average American.

Test your knowledge!

Knowledge quiz

How much do you know about Singapore?

See if you know more than the average American.

Test your knowledge!

No replies yet…

Be the first to reply to this comment.

About this author

Learn more about the author that submitted this comment.

@PigletSummer

Last activeActivity1 discussionsInfluence1 engagementsEngagement bias100%Audience bias0%Active in
Taiwanese Nationalism  1 Comments  1
PartyUndeclaredLocationUnknown

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2yrs2Y

A Moment of Darkness': Washington Post's No-Endorsement Decision Ignites Media Firestorm

Even though the presidential race between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris is neck and neck, The Washington Post has decided not to make a presidential endorsement for the first time in 36 years, the publisher and CEO announced Friday."We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates," Will Lewis wrote in an opinion piece published on the paper's website. He referenced the paper's policy in the decades prior to 1976, when, following the Watergate scandal that the Post broke, it endorsed Democratic nominee Jimmy Carter. The last time the Post did not endorse a presidential candidate in the general election was 1988, according to a search of its archives.Colleagues learned the news from the editorial page editor, David Shipley, at a tense meeting shortly before Lewis' announcement. The meeting was characterized by someone with direct knowledge of discussions on condition of anonymity to speak about internal matters.Shipley said that he told other editorial board leaders Thursday by management that there would be no endorsement, though he has known for weeks. He added that he "owns" this decision. The reason he cited was to create "independent space" where the newspaper does not tell people for whom to vote.Colleagues were said to be "shocked" and uniformly negative. Post corporate spokespeople have not responded to multiple messages left by NPR on the subject.Former Washington Post Executive Editor Martin Baron, who led the newsroom to acclaim during Trump's presidency, denounced the decision starkly."This is cowardice, a moment of darkness that will leave democracy as a casualty," Baron said in a statement to NPR. "Donald Trump will celebrate this as an invitation to further intimidate The Post’s owner, Jeff Bezos (and other media owners). History will mark a disturbing chapter of spinelessness at an institution famed for courage."A similar decision by Los Angeles Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong led this week to the resignations of the paper's editorials editor and two editorial board members. Soon-Shiong said that he had asked the editorial board to draft a "factual analysis" of Trump and Harris' policies and plans. In her resignation letter, editorials editor Mariel Garza said the decision made the paper look “craven and hypocritical,” given its past reporting and editorials on Trump.

▲  1013 replies