Try the political quiz
+

481 Replies

 @9ZHLJ8VLibertarian from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, only if estimates show that new developments would be more effective over maintenance and repair

 @9XXRJ3DLibertarian from Michigan  answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but prioritize alternative modes of transportation over car-centric infrastructure (I.e. high speed rail, light rail, greenways, bike lanes, etc.)

 @slangford12Libertarian  from California  answered…2yrs2Y

Should be based on current data usage combined with cost benefit analysis.

 @9QXR5T4Libertarian from Washington  answered…2yrs2Y

No, we need to rapidly build infrastructure to support the evolution of new technologies and power requirements

 @6SMQ8CYLibertarian from Texas  answered…2yrs2Y

No, with climate change, we need to emphasize building new infrastructure and completely replacing old infrastructure

 @3H6X5RQLibertarian answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, but the federal government should only assist the states' maintenance and repair of routes that can affect interstate commerce.

 @KMSkipperLibertarian  from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

This should be tackled on a case by case basis, not a singular policy decision.

 @53PP5W5Libertarian answered…2yrs2Y

Stupid question is stupid. Should government choose A over B when there is so much nuance and so many variables not addressed here?

 @Darktrooper007Libertarian  from Georgia  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9RWC8P9Libertarian from North Carolina  answered…2yrs2Y

Prioritize repairing dangerous roads and bridges but aim to upgrade them in the long run. Focus on better city planning.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...