Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
These active users have achieved an understanding of common concepts and the history regarding the topic of
These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of
@9H8WTT7Republican3yrs3Y
@9H936M43yrs3Y
@9H8NZYDRepublican3yrs3Y
@9H7ZZ7N3yrs3Y
@9H8NCJ73yrs3Y
@9H8VNNV3yrs3Y
@9H87MDM3yrs3Y
@9H8RXPJ3yrs3Y
@9H8QNDC3yrs3Y
@9H97ZN73yrs3Y
@9H8KTGL3yrs3Y
@9H98L8N3yrs3Y
@9H93DZD3yrs3Y
@9H8FP9B3yrs3Y
@9H7LFPK3yrs3Y
@9H7RNV53yrs3Y
@9H9CRSDLibertarian 3yrs3Y
No, everyone in the states should be treated with the same respect and courtesy as a us citizen. Nationalism is wrong and leads to wars.
@9LG457D2yrs2Y
@9LG4C88Republican2yrs2Y
@9LG346B 2yrs2Y
Absolutely, if a country cannot survive at all without the help of others at this point in time there's nothing we can do to make it better. Africa, to begin with, needs to be cut off from aid and learn to stand on its own two legs for once, otherwise the only thing we can do is offer to re-colonize it and take charge of their natural resources in return for our stabilizing presence.
The West has sent almost 3 Trillion dollars in various forms of aid to Africa over the past few decades; and the only thing that has done is to further corrupt their political class and offer no significant… Read more
@9H8Z39C3yrs3Y
@9H8S2CH3yrs3Y
@9H8CG6K3yrs3Y
@9H8NCP63yrs3Y
@9H7SBX63yrs3Y
@9KNP7Q4Libertarian2yrs2Y
Well as the UNited States we are the finishline, everyone wants to become like us in a certain way, but we should protect ourselves and the world first, over another countries beliefs.
@9KV4XZDRepublican 2yrs2Y
I think that Americans should be prioritized. It seems counterproductive for an American citizen to vote for a candidate who won’t put them first, and will choose citizens in another country whose government isn’t doing enough to support them. It isn’t our responsibility to care for every other country in the world because they are less fortunate. I think we should do everything we can to help to an extent; we should help them stay afloat, but they shouldn’t rely on us to bail them out every time. There are American people who need government assistance, and the U.S government should put the American people first. We should fix the problems in our own country before we try to fix problems in another.
@9KLBFWY2yrs2Y
I think it's important for a country to strike a balance between prioritizing its own citizens' wellbeing and engaging in global cooperation.
@9KLMXT7Independent2yrs2Y
@9KLKSF8Independent2yrs2Y
@9KSKTYDIndependent 2yrs2Y
A country needs to prioritize its citizen's well-being, but there are certain scenarios where global action is required, and in such cases, action should be taken. A good nation will have a common sense of when to prioritize their citizens or when to cooperate globally, but more often than not, we should solve our problems before we solve others.
@9KW2PJC 2yrs2Y
@9KLS5FK 2yrs2Y
Absolutely! There are so many people in NEED in the USA.
Ukraine and Israel should not be receiving so much aid. That money needs to be invested IN EVERYONE THAT PAYS TAXES- for universal Healthcare and education instead.
@9KLW72XConstitution2yrs2Y
While many people are in need, a large amount of these citizens choose to remain so. The government already has programs in place to provide relief to the needy and homeless. While some just have a rough go, many people refuse to ask for help, or spend all their money on drugs and hookers. In these cases, it is the fault of the individual, not the government
@9KLV8ZW2yrs2Y
@9H8PWJG3yrs3Y
@9H8WBSQWomen’s Equality3yrs3Y
@9H7VRH9Women’s Equality3yrs3Y
@9H8VQRJ3yrs3Y
@Desmond-HawkConstitution 3yrs3Y
The better question is "why WOULDN'T a country prioritize its own citizens?" Governments don't exist for the sake of the world. They exist for the people who built them. Voting for a leader who will place globalist agendas over the wellbeing of your own family is antirational.
@9HYYZQX2yrs2Y
@TotallyNotAttila 3yrs3Y
@9KPWL522yrs2Y
@9H88JYWLibertarian3yrs3Y
@9H97WT83yrs3Y
@9H942Z83yrs3Y
@9KCKLQSLibertarian2yrs2Y
@9KQ7RMBRepublican2yrs2Y
Our own country is falling apart. We simply cannot afford to be concerned with the outside world, unless it affects us.
@9KSJJZM2yrs2Y
@9L6YDGB2yrs2Y
@9KPXZPJ2yrs2Y
@9KTJ75Y2yrs2Y
individual Countries will never be permanent but what matters is the wellbeing of the things that will last. preservation of life and happiness is more important than a single nation. Another counter-example would be that countries or other forms of unity will never go away. Humans are a species that works better together and they will always form groups of some kind.
@9L7BYFY2yrs2Y
@9L9279YIndependent2yrs2Y
@9L59PFW2yrs2Y
@9L5XXKGRepublican2yrs2Y
@9KNL3S2Women’s Equality2yrs2Y
@9KRCMDK2yrs2Y
@9H92YD63yrs3Y
Yes, because healthcare is very important and the government should care about its people in order to keep a happy, healthy country.
@9L2PB7C2yrs2Y
If this question is saying we should have free healthcare I disagree because someone has to be paying the doctors and nurses. We will still be paying for it but it will just be in the middle-class's taxes. It not fair for those people that do not have to go to the doctor that often to be paying for other peoples healthcare.
@9L2GR882yrs2Y
@9KWL2N82yrs2Y
@9KYZDJV2yrs2Y
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
