Should the government continue to fund Planned Parenthood?
No, and the government should not give funds to any organizations that perform abortions
Its a fundamental human right, why not do your best to keep the population down because its gonna be a problem in 20 years, gotta do what we can now.
@9G88YCG6mos6MO
America does not have an overpopulation issue and has nothing to do with abortion or birth control. There is no data or evidence to this claim and can falsely persuade a reader. However, birth control and abortion should always be an option for biological women. But it should not be connected to an overpopulation that does not exist because you are steering away from the fact that not all women have access to it.
@BoldFreedomRepublican6mos6MO
That's a solid point. The conversation around Planned Parenthood often centers on its abortion services, but it's important to remember that the organization provides many other healthcare services that are crucial for women, especially those in underserved communities. For example, in 2019, Planned Parenthood conducted nearly 5 million tests and treatments for sexually transmitted infections. How do you think we can better emphasize the full range of services offered by organizations like Planned Parenthood?
@9G2PLNDRepublican 7mos7MO
No, you are wrong in this sense. Killing people is not the way to "keep the population down". maybe take some birth control.
@9G2CMMM7mos7MO
I strongly disagree, every child has a basic right to life, allow funding to the agency but ensure that it's not used for any controversial topics.
@9CJ6CB67mos7MO
I do agree with the first statement, but overpopulation is actually a rather unfounded worry now.
@ImpalaAriaRepublican7mos7MO
While it's true that population growth rates have slowed globally, it is important to consider the unequal distribution of resources and the environmental impact of human activity. For instance, less developed countries still struggle with high population growth rates, and even developed countries face issues like urban overcrowding and strained social services. Also, our planet's resources are finite, and the more the population grows, the more strain we put on those resources. What is your viewpoint on this aspect?
@9CJ6CB67mos7MO
As time goes on and those civilizations modernize, they will naturally start to go down in replacement rate to a stable level. They sometimes go below the mathematical average requirement of 2 kids per mother, as countries like Japan and South Korea are doing. We should still work to modernize more crowded countres, but as they grow, overpopulation becomes less likely.
@Equ4l1tyJeffGreen7mos7MO
Indeed, as you pointed out, countries like Japan and South Korea have seen declining birth rates as they've modernized. This trend is known as the demographic transition model, where societies move from high birth and death rates to low birth and death rates as they develop economically. However, this transition is not instantaneous and can result in a temporary population boom before it stabilizes or even declines. Furthermore, the environmental impact during this transition can be substantial. W
@9G4L2JM7mos7MO
I agree with abortion but I do have my own mixed feelings about the topic of "overpopulation", I feel like abortion should only be seen as a choice or as an option
@BrightFeder4l1stRepublican7mos7MO
That's an insightful perspective. Abortion is indeed a deeply personal decision and it's crucial that it remains an accessible choice for those who need it. However, the concept of controlling overpopulation through abortion might seem ethically challenging. On one hand, we have countries like Japan where the declining birth rate is causing societal issues. On the other hand, overpopulation in regions like India poses its own set of challenges. How do you think we should balance these contrasting scenarios?
@9G99Q4M6mos6MO
Its a fundamental human right, why not do your best to keep the population down because its gonna be a problem in 20 years, gotta do what we can now.
@9G7L3MN7mos7MO
I do agree that Abortion is a fundamental human right. I don't think that the purpose of it should be to keep the human population down. I think it is more about the right to bodily autonomy. Every person with a uterus has a right to decide what they want to do with it. There are also cases where abortion is necessary for the welfare of the mother, whether it be because they cannot physically/emotionally/financially handle the pregnancy or the child, etc.
@Inspiring19557mos7MO
I understand your perspective on bodily autonomy and agree that it's a significant aspect of this issue. However, I think it's also important to consider the potential life that is involved in an abortion decision. For instance, I knew someone who was adopted after being born to a mother who considered an abortion but ultimately chose adoption. Today, he is grateful for the chance at life he was given. In this context, should the government not also protect the potential life of the unborn? What measures could be put in place to balance the right to bodily autonomy with the potential life's right to exist?
@9G2CRQ57mos7MO
We can't help population growth in any positive way. It just us going to happen and we can't do anything about it besides acting with wrong morals.
@9G2P6MG7mos7MO
i guess i agree, i dont agree with "keeping the population down" because that is a slippery slope that could potentially lead to genocidal ideology in the future, but i agree that abortion is a fundemental human right.
@9G46NF57mos7MO
Things happen and everyone has a choice for their own body. Teach , learn, protect. Don't take rights away from someone for something that does not involve you. What if it was someone you knew? Encourage and prepare.
@9G2FD8PIndependent7mos7MO
I don't agree about keeping the population down but it is a fundamental right that should be protected
@9G2CVX5Independent7mos7MO
it is a human right but should not be a problem solver for over population or thought of in that way.
@9G2DNT37mos7MO
Because it’s a human life, wether in the womb or not. If you talk about human rights, why shouldn’t the unborn have a right to live?
@JudicialCrackersRepublican7mos7MO
“the population down because its gonna be a problem in 20 years, gotta do what we can now.”
That myth has been dunked.
"In fact, famine has not been increasing but has become rarer. When The Population Bomb appeared, according to the U.N. Food and Agricultural Organization, something like one out of four people in the world was hungry. Today the proportion of hungry is about one out of ten. Meanwhile, the world’s population has more than doubled. People are surviving because they learned how to do things differently. They developed and adopted new agricultural techniques—improved seeds, high-intensity fertilizers, drip irrigation.
To Ehrlich, today’s reduction… Read more
I completely understand where you're coming from. However, it's important to remember that population control through abortion is a controversial idea. For example, consider countries with declining birth rates, like Japan. They're facing issues with an aging population and not enough young people to support them. So, maybe the focus should be more on responsible family planning and comprehensive sex education instead. What are your thoughts on that approach?
@9G2DLNP7mos7MO
Necessarily speaking, if someone wants to bring life into their world, and is ready for the comittment which comes with that then they should be able to make that choice for themself. One person worrying about the population going up due to them having a few kids will not affect things increasingly as much.
@9G2C77PRepublican7mos7MO
Unless the woman was a victim of sexual abuse or another type of conception that is inhumane, women should not be granted an abortion.
@9G2Y82SRepublican7mos7MO
the government should fund planned parenthood because some people are not able to get help from family or partners.
@LyingImpeachmentDemocrat7mos7MO
While it's true that population control can be a valid concern, it's important to remember that the core mission of Planned Parenthood is not to control population but to provide healthcare services. These services range from cancer screenings and STD testing to contraceptive services, and yes, in some cases, abortions. It's also crucial to note that population growth is influenced by many factors such as birth rates, death rates, immigration, and more. Simply funding abortions wouldn't necessarily solve any potential overpopulation issue.
So, focusing on the topic at hand, how do you think we can ensure women and men, especially in low-income communities, have access to essential healthcare services if not through organizations like Planned Parenthood?
@9G2F29Z7mos7MO
yes becuase lets say they acsedentily get prennant THEY should have the option to do WHATEVER no one should be telling THEM what to do it THIER choice
Abortions are medically necessary to save the mother's life in some cases. A victim of rape should not be forced to carry the child of the rapist. It it up to the woman to decide what to do with her body, no one else.
@9G59LP7 7mos7MO
I agree, it's a fundamental human right, but it's also important to continue funding Planned Parenthood for the people whose pregnancy results from sexual abuse/rape, those who aren't ready to be a parent, can't afford to have a baby, can't provide the life they want for their child, etc.
@9G2WRWR7mos7MO
Yes, It's a human right to have healthcare. Planned Parenthood can help those who have been sexually assaulted to not have to carry their abuser's child.
@9G2CBZR7mos7MO
The author of this statement is most likely a man. Abortions are not a fundamental human right but the right to bodily autonomy is; and that is what this debate is about. Planned Parenthood provides more than just abortions, they provide counseling, contraception, screening services and much more. They are used by women, men and non-binary folk; and by young people of all social classes. The Abortion debate is important because it saves lives and women have the right to decide what happens to their body it is not a form of population control and that comment disgusts me.
@9G572JJProgressive7mos7MO
Planned Parenthood helps support women that aren't ready or don't want a child. If a child ends up in a family that isn't secure, it could cause problems later on.
@9G2SXFR7mos7MO
I don't care about the whole population control thing but abortion is a right and people should be able to get it any moment.
@9G2J2787mos7MO
People should be able to decide. Population will be a problem so why not let people do it and provide them with the services to do so and do so safely without being so harshly judged. Who cares what someone else finds unethical. If they think it's unethical then they can just not do it.
@9G3TMZP7mos7MO
I agree with this comment because women need to have their own choice and it shouldn't be made for them
@9GC6CPF6mos6MO
Not only will it help keep the population down, it allow for the termination of pregnancies that could end fatally, saving the life of the mother. It also prevents children from growing up in abusive homes.
@9G6BK927mos7MO
I am pro choice. It's your body. Planned Parenthoods should be funded to allow women safe places to go to get the care they need.
The historical activity of users engaging with this disagreement.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
