Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

State Senate District:

Expert Pundits

These active users have achieved advanced knowledge of the terminology, history, and legal implications regarding the topic of Decentralized Finance

1273 Replies

 @B775NQF from Arizona  answered…3wks3W

I would have to learn more about it to have a full opinion, but I think the US should test it out if unhappy with the current centralized system we have right now.

 @B6JV5TV from Arizona  answered…2mos2MO

We should abolish the economy based on money and commodity production and replace it with a socialist system.

 @B44HK49 from Arizona  answered…7mos7MO

Transitioning to a decentralized financial system could promote transparency, reduce centralization of power, and provide more inclusive access to financial services

 @B3FN6XD from Arizona  answered…7mos7MO

no because it will led to more fraud in the financail system like pump and dump and insider trade and other white collar crime.

 @9ZYY9V5 from Arizona  answered…10mos10MO

yes and no, banks have security systems and fallback plans if something goes wrong they have professionals that specialize in the banking field. If that system were to transition to anything like the internet it would be harder to implement personal security for individuals

 @9ZJTGYM from Arizona  answered…11mos11MO

Yes, but only if it’s truly decentralized and is monitored by a trusted online protection unit to prevent criminals from using it.

 @9SPXCNV from Arizona  answered…1yr1Y

Yes, though I believe more attention, and even aid would need to be provided towards those that lie in the poverty rate that don't even own cellphones, or barely have access to any electricity.

 @9SLMXZ3 from Arizona  answered…1yr1Y

A hybrid approach, where certain aspects of the financial system become decentralized while others remain under centralized control, might offer a balanced solution that leverages the strengths of both models

 @9RX47NHIndependence from Arizona  answered…1yr1Y

No, this would not promote market competition or advancement in the industry as a standardized protocol would push for a greater focus on providing widespread access to the technology.

 @9HRMJF6Democrat from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

Not now. Blockchain technology is in its infancy, and has not been tested well enough to trust our financial system to it. But we shouldn't rule it out completely. It needs to be tested on a small scale for a number of years. However, our current system, controlled by corporations, brokerages, exchanges, and banks has proven untrustworthy in serving the interests of the American public. We need a new system that will reduce wealth inequality by providing more transparent, affordable, and inclusive access to financial services. We also need better protections from hostile agents, e.g. Russia, China, N. Korea, organized crime and terrorists, who are trying to manipulate our political and financial systems. In short, we need a total overhaul that focuses on the best interests of average working people.

 @9HLT46H  from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

We need to put more focus on the people and do what is right for us all and that will never be accomplished with financial means. It was a stepping stone and now we need to do what’s right without thinking a dollar value is going to solve anything.

 @9DYHMBN from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9DD3W6C from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

Financial systems should be free anyway, we should get to choose our form of currency

 @9D9C6JZ from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

Unbacked currency is pointless, the value should not change, this is why the rich stay rich and the poor stay poor. It should be outlawed in it's entirety

 @9GHNDKM from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

Should the technology of our financial system transition to a decentralized protocol, that is not owned or controlled by any corporation, similar to the internet? That's what I thought.

 @9CNTNLD from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

I would say yes, but I would prefer if there were extensive trials to pick a few individuals who were devoid of greed, want for personal gain, holding grudges, etc.. Then after they had run simulations or done tests on willing communities to find the best way to reach the outcome of everyone being equal with the chance to gain more, but not to use to put down others, they would be in charge of implementing it and making sure to make adjustments as time went on and things happened.

 @9BZ7LDQ from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

 @9BYMHSQRepublican from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

 @94SM6DZIndependent from Arizona  answered…3yrs3Y

I think that there should be a medium - so if you wanted to use credit, savings, investing and purchasing you can but you can also use decentralized methods too.

 @ogoldman from Arizona  answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but their should still be relevant government regulations in place to minimize illegal activity and corporations should be able to create their own protocols to support those who place more trust in institutions

 @97ZZ99N from Arizona  answered…3yrs3Y

Yes but only if regulations are put in place to prevent manipulation and loopholes

 @9C9F5TL from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

Our financial system should be backed by something that has intrinsic value.

 @9DVM8P3 from Arizona  answered…2yrs2Y

I believe that banks are untrustworthy as a whole and that society would be better off without them if the general public was able to safely store their money themselves. In terms of convenience, banks are incredibly helpful in storing, helping to budget, and help us manage our money, so they are a necessary evil.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...