Try the political quiz
+

Engaged Voters

These active users have achieved a basic understanding of terms and definitions related to the topic of

10 Replies

 @9FLS446 from Ohio  disagreed…2yrs2Y

No animals are living beings and should not be subjected to testing that could kill them and they can't consent to it. Animals are living breathing beings and should not be treated like inanimate objects that are only here to benefit humans.

 @9FMLZRNDemocrat from Indiana  disagreed…2yrs2Y

Animals are beings of nature, just as we are and just as we have been since the beginning of time. You wouldn’t want to see your family pet be abused and poked and prodded with needles, so why are these other animals any different? Why shouldn’t we practice on other humans, wouldn’t that show how makeup and devices and other things work on human skin or how well they work with humans better than animals?

  @HelcovichEmireRepublican from Maryland  commented…5mos5MO

The value of a pet comes from the owner's view and love of them. If no person loves that animal like a pet, then that animals' live is worthless and expendable.

 @9FMHPCFWomen’s Equality from North Carolina  disagreed…2yrs2Y

I feel we should not test any product on any animals I feel we should test them on the criminals on death row, the criminals that have been given live sentence. Because the animals don't desurve to be tested on.

  @HelcovichEmireRepublican from Maryland  disagreed…5mos5MO

First of all, I don't think there are enough criminals on death row anyways. But most importantly, murderers deserve to die in a similar fashion to how they killed their victim, not by being experimented on like an animal.

 @9FLRDWHWomen’s Equality from Indiana  disagreed…2yrs2Y

The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel but also often ineffective. Animals do not naturally get the diseases that humans do. Such as types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease or schizophrenia. Signs of these diseases are artificially induced in animals in laboratories in an attempt to mock the human disease. These experiments belittle the human conditions which are affected by wide ranges of variables. (Ex: genetics and psychological issues)

 @9GRVYDRdisagreed…2yrs2Y

If it is not for cosmetics then what would it be for. If cleaning products, that is worse than makeup.

 @9FMM2V5disagreed…2yrs2Y

Animals are family to us and we need them to continue growing as a race, so why would we test things on them, and not on ourselves.

 @9FMKFMVProgressivedisagreed…2yrs2Y

Animals are living beings. If we wouldn't test it on a human why would we test it on another living soul?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...