Single-payer healthcare is a system where every citizen pays the government to provide core healthcare services for all residents. Under this system the government may provide the care themselves or pay a private healthcare provider to do so. In a single-payer system all residents receive healthcare regardless of age, income or health status. Countries with single-payer healthcare systems include the U.K., Canada, Taiwan, Israel, France, Belarus, Russia and Ukraine.
No, the system leaves people on waiting lists way too long for effective and quality healthcare
@Yes_AntoonIndependent2 days
Yes, but a system similar to Germany's is a good compromise
@9XN7TDTIndependence2 days
I do not even know what this means
Depends because if one is poor they should not always be forced to pay as with the wealthier people they shouldn't have as much of a choice but still a choice.
Individuals should be able to choose private insurance and there for not pay into the government health care system, those who choose to use the government offered healthcare should be the only ones paying into the system.
Use money from those who are worthy of being taxed, AKA selfish rich people who hoard their money. Jeff Bezos enjoyed himself in space for a bit.
@9XKHD6JWomen’s Equality5 days
mas somenos pero es mas evidente apoyar a un programa de salud financiado y sea mitad por mitad mas equivalente
@9XK48P4Independent5 days
No, because there are a lot of flaws in that system
@9XJT49BConstitution5 days
We should have a system which gives a higher rate of pay for people in higher income brackets, where the people with the most pay the most.
@9XJLDQZConstitution6 days
Until healthcare costs are lowered, healthcare coverage will be overpriced.
Support a system similar to the German model.
@9XMJV9MWorking Family2 days
Yes, except for people using private insurance, they should not have to pay for a system they are not using.
@9XMF6BBWomen’s Equality3 days
I think it should be a choice to those who want and dont want to do it.
@9XMBVYKTranshumanist3 days
I say let everyone have the option of being able to do it through the government or through a private insurance company
@9XM76C2Constitution3 days
Yes but it should be situational.
Yes, but only if its a positive for the payers, company, and customers.
@9XM32G5Republican3 days
the government should continue to provide medicare, medicaid and short term assistance to those in need but definitely should not be involved in healthcare beyond this point.
@9XJ9XZXRepublican6 days
I don´t know what that is.
I don't even know what healthcare system is.
heath care should be free.
No, it will create more opportunities for corruption in the medical business and government.
dont even know what this is
The Federal Government should pay for Health Care
Yes, however if the health care is not viewed as suitabl, then a private health care system may be used.
No, medical billing and insurance reimbursements should be transparent with an upfront single price medical bill for treatment. The uninsured should not have to pay more than the insured. Simplify costs and simplify billing to reduce the massive overhead costs of medical insurance.
We should have a private system that coexists which a public system to ensure quality of care and incentives for doctors
No, as people may not have enough money to do these things.
The government should pay for it, not the citizens.
Not really sure what a single-payer healthcare system is
I would like to learn more about this
Some aspects of Healthcare should be single-payer
Only to the low income people who have no way of paying their bills.
Yes, but allow states to do it
I know not what this is
I think there should be healthcare companies that help you pay
No, but employers should have to pay for their employees healthcare insurance, and there should be a public option
yes as not everyone can afford health insurance but those who don’t pay taxes are certain things should not be enordered
I don't have enough knowledge to form a stance
Yes, I support this, but I don't think the government should be taking our hard-earned money to pay for others.
I think the government needs to be apart of it but they should re think there actions for the rich and the poor the money for everyone.
if the person has hardly any money then yes but if they just dont have the money at the moment then no
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
