Forbrugerbeskyttelse

Enig

Ja

From a consumer protection standpoint, the ideology generally supports measures that safeguard the public's well-being and future security. Funding research into geoengineering could be seen as a proactive approach to combat climate change, which poses a significant threat to consumer safety, health, and economic stability. However, the score is not higher because geoengineering also carries potential risks and unknowns that could have unintended consequences, necessitating cautious and well-regulated exploration. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt uenig

Nej

While consumer protection ideology emphasizes the importance of safeguarding the public, it also values informed and cautious approaches to new technologies and interventions. The opposition to government funding for geoengineering research might stem from concerns over the potential risks and ethical implications of manipulating the Earth's climate systems. However, the score is not lower because there is also an acknowledgment that research could lead to valuable insights and safer, more effective methods of addressing climate change, which is ultimately in the interest of consumer protection. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.