Myslíte si, podporovat národní normy společné jádro?
Thank you for the reply! My plans to mitigate the risks of high taxation include actually improving…
While your plan to mitigate the risks of higher taxation and implement UBI has merit, there are some aspects that may need further consideration. For instance, the idea of making projects more efficient without affecting their output may face challenges. Efficiency savings are often harder to realize than anticipated. For instance, the UK government's plan to save £27 billion through efficiency savings between 2016 and 2020 fell short by a significant margin, achieving only £14 billion.
Regarding the UBI, the condition of being employed for at least 3 months during the tax year might exclude some of the most vulnerable individuals who are unable to secure employment. Furthermore, the Alaska Permanent Fund, which is a form of UBI, has shown that such policies can lead to an increase in part-time work but a decrease in full-time employment.
Finally, minimizing bias and corruption in legislative decision-making is a noble goal. However, it's a complex issue that extends beyond tax loophole closure. The Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 in the U.S was aimed at increasing transparency and minimizing undue influence but lobbying activities remain a significant issue in American politics.
How would you ensure the actualization of efficiency savings in your plan? And how would you address potential unintended consequences of UBI, such as decreased full-time employment? Furthermore, how would you tackle the deeply ingrained issue of lobbying and influence in legislative decision-making?
Buďte první, kdo odpoví na tuto nesouhlas .